Delhi High Court: No Tearing Hurry to Roll out 50% Reservation for Locals This Academic Year

Must Read

Plea Seeking Dream 11 to Be Declared as Betting Platform Dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan HC dismissed a plea that alleged Dream 11 to be a betting platform, on the assertion that the...

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

Follow us

Delhi HC observed that NLU Delhi succumbed to the pressure exerted by the Delhi Government. It was while staying the move to introduce a 50% horizontal reservation for local candidates. The Court granted interim relief to the Petitioners (Balvinder Sangwan v. NCT of Delhi & Ors).

Facts of the case

The students of NLU Delhi had filed a petition against the introduction of a 50% horizontal reservation at the University. It was for candidates who cleared their qualifying examinations from institutes in Delhi. Pia Singh is one of the petitioners. She intended to pursue an LL.M. from NLU Delhi after graduating from a University in Rajasthan.

Arguments

The petitioners contended that the reservation was contrary to the NLU Delhi Act. They prayed to declare it as being void and ultra vires of the National Law University Act, 2007. Further, it violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners have also prayed that the Delhi Government or the Directorate of Higher Education are not in the power to interfere in the administrative and functional autonomy of NLU, Delhi.

The Delhi Government stated that the decision was in furtherance of its reservation policy in all state universities. The respondents also contended that the alumni of NLU Delhi – had no locus standi.

Court’s Decision

The Court said that the petitioners cannot be treated as meddlesome interlopers. They are not busybodies who have nothing to do with the functioning of the University. They are also concerned with the increase in the number of seats which will affect the existing infrastructure of the University.

The Court stated that it appears that NLU Delhi succumbed to the pressure that was being exerted by the Delhi Government only to buy peace without awaiting the recommendations of the Committee.

The Court said that when a statute provides for a thing to be in a particular manner, it has to be done in that manner only. It concluded that the impugned decision prima facie violated the NLU Delhi Act. The Court observed that if the decision did not stay, grave prejudice would occur.

Thus the order of the Court says, “Status quo ante as of the previous academic year shall be maintained for making admissions to the BA LL.B and LL.M in NLU Delhi, for the academic year 2020-21.”

The Court directed NLU Delhi to issue a public notice on or before 02.07.2020, informing the public at large about the decision taken above. Further, granting a further period of one week from the date of issuance of public notice to enable interested candidates to submit their applications for admission.

The redrawn schedule will not interfere with the entrance examinations, for ones which are to take place in August 2020, the Court clarified.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Plea Seeking Dream 11 to Be Declared as Betting Platform Dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan HC dismissed a plea that alleged Dream 11 to be a betting platform, on the assertion that the game depends on skill &...

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -