Delhi High Court Issues Notice to Ensure Display of Manufacturing Country’s Name on Products Being Sold on E-Commerce Websites

Must Read

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Follow us

The Delhi High Court issued notice in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed. This was to ensure that a manufacturing country’s name was displayed on products being sold on E-Commerce websites.

Brief Facts of the Case

China had caused several disruptions to not only India but the entire world through the Coronavirus inducement. Thus, the Indian Government had been taking several initiatives to boycott Chinese products and to promote Indian products. Several Chinese apps were also banned from being used in India. Therefore, in the current situation, Mr. Amit Shukla had filed a Public Interest Litigation. This was to ensure that e-commerce websites would include the manufacturing country’s name on all their products. The Court issued a notice with regards to this PIL on 1st July 2020 (Amit Shukla vs UOI & Ors.).

Contentions

The petitioner prefers this PIL on the basis of Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011, in view of Rules 6 and 10. This states that all E-Commerce entities are mandated to publish the name of the products’ country of origin/ manufacturer on their platform. He contended that the same was yet to be enforced qua E-Commerce companies.

“Most Indians want to buy Indian products now… (one) should know what he is buying from E-Commerce websites.”

He stated that some E-Commerce companies do mention the country of manufacturing on products. But they do so in a discreet manner which would not be easily searchable by the
consumers at large. The petitioner also pointed out to the recent notification of the Central Government. It mentioned that all the sellers on the Government E-Marketplace (GeM) should also mandatorily enter their country of origin. They should also do so while registering new products for sale on the platform.

“Because the citizens of the country particularly in view of the tensions in the border and aggression of the neighbour intend to buy any products originating from the neighbour (Republic of China). It submitted that the heavy export is the backbone of the Republic of China and in the event, India is self-reliant, the same would strengthen the defence services in-turn boosting the strength of the nation.”

The PIL sought direction to the Court to ensure that E-Commerce entities publish or display the ‘Made in India’ option separately and conspicuously. The petitioner also sought a direction to the Centre to ensure compliance of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 in the capacity of E-Commerce website.

Court’s Decision

A Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan heard the case. They issued notice to the Central Government and E-Commerce platforms. Some of the platforms were Amazon, Nykaa, Snapdeal, etc.

The next hearing would be on 22nd July 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -