Delhi High Court Issues Notice to Enforcement Directorate in Shivinder Singh’s Bail Plea

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

The Delhi HC issued a notice to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in former Religare promoter Shivinder Mohan Singh’s bail plea. The Court asked the ED to respond to the bail plea in the money laundering case at Religare Finvest Ltd (RFL). The case in hand is Shivinder Mohan Singh vs. Directorate of Enforcement.

Facts of the Case

The Economic Offences Wing of the Delhi Police registered an FIR on a complaint by RFL. The complaint was filed against Shivinder Singh, his brother Malvinder Singh and others in the Enforcement Directorate’s money laundering.

In January, the ED had filed a charge sheet before the Court against promoter Malvinder Mohan Singh, Shivinder Singh, and former CMD of RFL Sunil Godhwani. The case was related to the alleged misappropriation of funds at RFL.

RFL accused the brothers of siphoning and side-tracking loans by the company. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested Shivinder Singh on December 12, 2019. He was remanded to 14 days’ custody. 

The ED informed the Court about enough evidence to initiate the proceedings. The three accused were charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Shivinder Singh is going under judicial custody.

Shivinder approached the HC after the Trial Court dismissed his bail plea. The grounds were that he had utilized the proceeds of crime. The various acts related to the advancement of unsecured loans have also come into the light during the investigation.

Petitioner’s Submissions

Senior Advocate Hariharan represented Shivinder Mohan Singh. He argued that all the evidence about the case is documentary in nature. There were no allegations about evidence tampering against the Petitioner.

He further claimed that the period in question was from 2008 to 2016. He contended that ED had filed the charge sheet about ₹300 crores. While the alleged misappropriated amount is ₹2,300 crores.

He remarked that there was still ambiguity with regards to the remaining ₹2,000 crores. He contended that judicial custody of Shivinder could not go on the presumption that the investigation would end with an adverse finding.

Inter alia, the petitioner also pointed out that the HC recently released in bail one of the accused in the Delhi Police case i.e. Anil Saxena.

Respondent’s Submissions

Standing Counsel Amit Mahajan represented the Enforcement Directorate. He submitted that the money was diverted through a complex web of transactions. It is not easy to find the trail of the money. 

He stated that releasing Shivinder on bail would hamper the further investigation. In light of this, he added that the Trial Court had refused to grant bail to Shivinder after passing a very detailed order. Further, he sought time to file a detailed reply to the bail application.

Court’s Decision

A single-judge bench of Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani conducted the hearing through video conferencing. He issued notice to the Enforcement Directorate on the bail plea. The Court granted the Enforcement Directorate time to file its status report.

The Court listed the matter for further hearing on July 2, 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -