Delhi High Court Issues Notice to Enforcement Directorate in Shivinder Singh’s Bail Plea

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

The Delhi HC issued a notice to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in former Religare promoter Shivinder Mohan Singh’s bail plea. The Court asked the ED to respond to the bail plea in the money laundering case at Religare Finvest Ltd (RFL). The case in hand is Shivinder Mohan Singh vs. Directorate of Enforcement.

Facts of the Case

The Economic Offences Wing of the Delhi Police registered an FIR on a complaint by RFL. The complaint was filed against Shivinder Singh, his brother Malvinder Singh and others in the Enforcement Directorate’s money laundering.

In January, the ED had filed a charge sheet before the Court against promoter Malvinder Mohan Singh, Shivinder Singh, and former CMD of RFL Sunil Godhwani. The case was related to the alleged misappropriation of funds at RFL.

RFL accused the brothers of siphoning and side-tracking loans by the company. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested Shivinder Singh on December 12, 2019. He was remanded to 14 days’ custody. 

The ED informed the Court about enough evidence to initiate the proceedings. The three accused were charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Shivinder Singh is going under judicial custody.

Shivinder approached the HC after the Trial Court dismissed his bail plea. The grounds were that he had utilized the proceeds of crime. The various acts related to the advancement of unsecured loans have also come into the light during the investigation.

Petitioner’s Submissions

Senior Advocate Hariharan represented Shivinder Mohan Singh. He argued that all the evidence about the case is documentary in nature. There were no allegations about evidence tampering against the Petitioner.

He further claimed that the period in question was from 2008 to 2016. He contended that ED had filed the charge sheet about ₹300 crores. While the alleged misappropriated amount is ₹2,300 crores.

He remarked that there was still ambiguity with regards to the remaining ₹2,000 crores. He contended that judicial custody of Shivinder could not go on the presumption that the investigation would end with an adverse finding.

Inter alia, the petitioner also pointed out that the HC recently released in bail one of the accused in the Delhi Police case i.e. Anil Saxena.

Respondent’s Submissions

Standing Counsel Amit Mahajan represented the Enforcement Directorate. He submitted that the money was diverted through a complex web of transactions. It is not easy to find the trail of the money. 

He stated that releasing Shivinder on bail would hamper the further investigation. In light of this, he added that the Trial Court had refused to grant bail to Shivinder after passing a very detailed order. Further, he sought time to file a detailed reply to the bail application.

Court’s Decision

A single-judge bench of Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani conducted the hearing through video conferencing. He issued notice to the Enforcement Directorate on the bail plea. The Court granted the Enforcement Directorate time to file its status report.

The Court listed the matter for further hearing on July 2, 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -