Delhi High Court Extends Interim Protection Granted to Journalist Vinod Dua

Must Read

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Follow us

The High Court of Delhi extended the interim protection granted to Vinod Dua in an FIR which alleges him of spreading misinformation and causing communal enmity on his YouTube channel.

Facts of the Case

The Petitioner, Vinod Dua is a known journalist and television anchor. BJP spokesperson Naveen Kumar filed an FIR against Dua. He complained about a section of Vinod Dua’s YouTube show which had talked about the riots that had happened in the Northeast district of Delhi. Hence, Mr Dua is so-called for spreading rumour and misinformation about the sensitive issue of the Delhi riots through his webcast. So during the current COVID crisis, it is causing public disaffection, which shall cause hatred and ill-will between different communities. For this, Mr Dua filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with section 482 of CrPC. The plea prayed for the quashing of FIR registered under sections 290, 505, 505(2) of IPC.

In the last hearing, it came to notice that that there’s no prima facie case against the Petitioner. And there is no allegation that any adverse consequences occurred due to the webcast.

Arguments before Court

For the Petitioner Senior Advocate, Vikas Singh appeared. He claimed that when the petitioner receives anticipatory bail, the continuation of the proceedings will lead to significant misconduct. Because he would need to visit the police station repeatedly.

Mr Singh further argued that there is no explanation for the inordinate delay in making the complaint and registration of the FIR. It got filed more than 70 days after the webcast.

Mr Anil Soni who appeared for the state opposed the submission. He submits that investigation in the matter is at a nascent stage and notice is only issued to YouTube. Also, the Petitioner has so far not even called for an investigation.

Court’s Observation

The court referred to the Supreme Court judgment in Manzar Sayeed Khan vs. the State of Maharashtra in the last order.

The court further observed that there was a substantial unexplained delay in filing the complaint and registration of the FIR. It also observed that what the complainant allegedly said in the webcast, is not what appears in the transcript of the webcast.

Court’s Order

The Single Bench of Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani extends the interim protection. It is further noted that since a similar matter is pending before the Supreme Court, the hearing in the present matter shall be adjourned till the Supreme Court takes the decision.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -