Delhi High Court Directs Blocking of 50 Rouge Websites Infringing Snapdeal Trademark

Must Read

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Follow us

The Delhi High Court had granted an injunction, in favour of e-commerce company Snapdeal, in relation to fifty rogue websites. The websites were infringing on its registered trademark.

Brief Facts of the Case

Snapdeal had filed a suit before the Court, after discovering that as many as 50 websites such as SNAPDEALLUCKY- DRAWS.ORG.IN, were inter alia degrading its goodwill. They were infringing on its registered trademark. These rogue websites had offered fraudulent prize schemes, lotteries, and lucky draws. They provided it in a manner that portrayed either emanation from Snapdeal or connection with it.

The plaintiff had, thus, wanted to protect its interest. They arrayed not only the domain registrars of the earlier mentioned rogue websites [i.e. defendant nos. 1 to 50] but also the Department of Telecommunications i.e. defendant no. 60, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology i.e. defendant no. 61, and National Internet Exchange of India i.e. defendant no. 63, so that orders passed by this Court can be efficaciously enforced.

Contentions of the Parties

Snapdeal contended that these websites were damaging its commercial and statutory interests. It stated that they also ended up defrauding gullible customers by having them erroneously believe that the websites have connections with Snapdeal. Apart from the 50 named websites, John Doe was also made a defendant to the suit.

This was to represent all those whose details were not known yet but, were carrying on a similar illegal activity. The plaintiff had approached this Court during the issuance of an interim order dated 01.11.2018, titled Jasper Infotech Private Limited vs. Aadi Sins & Ors.

Court’s Observations

A single Judge Bench of Justice Rajiv Shakdher had passed the order. The Court opined that a prima facie case had been made out in Snapdeal’s favour. This was after going through the submissions made by it and the balance of convenience was also tilted to its side. Continuation of such schemes would jeopardize not only the plaintiff’s interest but, that of the public at large too. Snapdeal had requested to show such rogue websites.

The Court ordered that if any information comes thereafter, qua them without having to file a fresh action. The Court considered the enormity of this issue. Thus, it granted the plaintiff liberty to approach the Court to array similar illegal websites as and when it comes to its notice. Advocate Swetashree Majumder had appeared for Snapdeal.

Court’s Decision

The Court had directed the authorities concerned to issue notification(s) to the Internet Service Providers. This was to block access to the 50 rogue websites. Order to suspend/block the domain names of those defendants registered with the domain registrars got announced. The plaintiff would follow the provisions of Order XXXIX Rule 3 of the CPC within 5 days of the receipt of a copy of this order. Defendant nos. 1 to 50, received injunctions from carrying on their activities either under the plaintiff’s trademark or any other, which is deceptive like the plaintiff’s trademark.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -