Delhi High Court Asks Bar Council of India to Decide on the Petition to Conduct CLAT in Local Languages

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

In Pratham Kaushik & Anr v. U.O.I. & Ors., the Delhi HC directed the Bar Council of India to consider the petition to conduct CLAT in local languages. A Single Bench Judge comprising of Najmi Waziri presided over this matter.

Brief facts of the Case

Common-Law Admission Test (CLAT) is a centralised national level entrance test. Through CLAT exam, one can secure admission in various law schools across India. Every year it’s conducted roughly in May. But unfortunately, due to COVID-19, the exam got postponed.

Mr Pratham Kaushik, the petitioner is a CLAT aspirant. He filed a petition to sought Court’s direction to conduct CLAT in local languages. An unregistered forum of parents and students also supported the petition. Moreover, they wish the conduction of CLAT exam in the Hindi Language. Senior Advocates KK. Rai, Ravindra Raizada with Advocates Gauraan Bhardwaj, Ashish Rai, represented the petitioners.

Above all, the petitioner prayed in Court to conduct all future CLAT examinations in local languages.

Petitioner’s Concerns

The petitioner submits that the absence of provisions to write the exam in local languages hinders several eligible candidates from participating in the examination.

The petitioner stated that the inclusion of local languages for writing the entrance exam would provide the highest standards of legal education. Moreover, such an action will disseminate learning and knowledge of the law and legal processes in an effective manner.

The petitioner further stated that it is unjust, unfair, improper to give primacy to English. Not only this but also that it upholds Article 343 of the Constitution of India. Article 343 provides Hindi as the National Language of India. The petitioner also pointed out the entrance exams of various government colleges. They were also conducted in vernacular languages.

Court’s Observation

The Court has observed that it is the BCI which sets the standard for admission into law schools. So they decided that it would be only fair for the BCI to take this decision.

Court’s Order

The Court has directed the BCI to treat the petition as petitioner’s representation. Further, the Court asked the BCI to take an appropriate decision in the same matter. Further, the Court asked the BCI to convey the decision within three weeks to the petitioner.

The Court further considered the dates of deposition of the forms for the exam. Since the forms are to be deposited by 30.06.2020, it would be preferable that the BCI takes a decision before this date. The petition, along with pending applications, got disposed-off.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -