Delhi High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance on Non-Payment of Salary to Government Teachers

Must Read

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and...

Follow us

The salaries of the teachers and various other employees of a government school had been due for the past few months. Teachers were also discharging COVID-19 duties. Considering this, the Delhi High Court has taken cognizance on this issue.

Brief Facts of the Case 

Akhil Dilli Prathmik Shikshak Sangh is the petitioner in the present case. It is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act. It comprises of a group of teachers of schools run by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi.

The writ petition ventilates a grievance of non-payment of salaries to the teachers. Salaries of teachers and several other employees working in different categories were due. On 9th June 2020, the Lower Court passed an order in this matter.

The Single Bench of the Court dismissed their petition on the ground that the remedy of the appellants lay before the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Court further directed the respondents to clear all the arrears within a week. It also asked them to release their salaries from March 2020. However, the respondents failed to follow the Court’s direction. 

Aggrieved by this situation the appellants approached the Delhi High Court. 

Arguments before the Court

Senior Advocate H.S. Phoolka appeared on behalf of the respondents. The respondents had filed an affidavit in the Court.

In the affidavit, they accepted the fact that they have not paid the salaries of these teachers as well as various other employees. This included the Group A Officials to the Safai Karamcharis. They informed the Court that they could not pay these salaries as the Delhi Government has not released the amount. These salaries were due from April 2020 to June 2020. 

Senior Advocate Phoolka further contended that the respondent runs 700 schools. These schools employ 9,000 teachers. Of these, more than 50% of the teachers were discharging COVID-19 duties. They were providing services related to the distribution of dry ration, providing cooked meals to the needy, etc.

“Around 5406 teachers have been roped in but their salaries remain due and payable from March 2020”, Nr.D.M.C submitted. 

Court’s Observation

A Bench comprising of Justice Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad presided over this matter. The Court highlighted the fact that the government cannot make these teachers run from post to pillar for their lawful dues.

It said, “To say the least, this is a very sorry state of affairs. The teachers cannot be left on a wing and a prayer. They must be released their rightful dues without any further delay. As they are being made to discharge COVID-19 duties at the instance of the Delhi Govt., they can be well equated with COVID-19 warriors.” 

Court’s Order

The Court directed the Delhi Government to file an affidavit responding to the statements made by the respondents. Further, it set a timeline for releasing the funds. 

As a result, the Court dismissed the present petition and took suo moto cognizance flagging the issue. The Court enlisted the matter on 30.6.2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -