Delhi HC Revives Breath Analyzer Test for Air Traffic Controllers

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

Lifting its earlier order of stay, the Delhi High Court had allowed a breath analyzer test through the tube process for air traffic controllers (ATCs) in the case of Air Traffic Controllers’ Guild (India) vs UOI.

Brief Facts

The Air Traffic Controllers’ Guild (India) had filed a petition. It had sought the suspension of the Breath Analyzer Test to prevent any exposure to COVID-19. The Court considered a modified application moved by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). In March, the Court had suspended the Breath Analyser Test through the tube process for ATCs till further orders. While the Breath Analyser Tests are still conducted in the case of a pilot, the same is completely stopped for the ATCs. Pursuant to the Court’s order, a meeting of experts and authorities took place. It concluded that the Breath Analyzer Test was the most efficient and reliable form of detecting alcohol in the breath of the person.

Other methods i.e. testing of blood and urine were neither practical nor under the provision of Civil Aviation Requirements (CARs). Medical Board suggested reviving the Breath Analyser with precautionary measures. This was to reduce the risk of COVID-19. The Report of the Medical Board recommended testing randomly in a day. Thereafter, the machine used for such random tests shall not be used for the next 12 hours, post conduction of one test. Besides the random test, the authorities may also test any person suspected to have consumed psychoactive substance.

Contentions

The Petitioner submitted that the Report did suggest the consideration of other methods for the conduct of the Breath Analyser Test and that a gap of at least 24 hours be kept between the single usage of a machine.

Court’s Observation

A single Judge Bench of Justice Navin Chawla was set up. After hearing the parties, the Court remarked that they are not an expert in the medical field.

“The Medical Report dated 16.06.2020 is pursuant to the directions issued by this Court and was headed by DGMS (Air) and attended by other Air Force Medical Officers. They are certainly the experts in their field.”

Thus, in view of the fact that the authorities agreed to take precautionary measures, and even reduce the number of tests, the Court concluded that there was no reason to continue with the interim order of stay.

“In the present case, the interests of the ATCs and of the air traveler have to be balanced.”

Advocate Piyush Sanghi appeared for the Petitioner. DGCA was represented by Advocates Anjana Gosain, Himanshi, Shalini Nair.

Court’s Decision

The Court thus modified the earlier order and noted that authorities shall be bound by the recommendations of the Medical Board. It also said that the Petitioner Association shall be at liberty to give suggestions/representations to the authorities with regard to further precautionary measures.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -