Delhi High Court: NIA Shows Hastiness in the Elgar Parishad Case

Must Read

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus....

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Follow us

The Delhi High Court questioned the National Investigation Agency (NIA) for taking Civil Rights Activist Gautam Navlakha to Mumbai. This happened while his interim bail plea was pending before the Delhi High Court.

Justice Anup J. Bhambhani heard the matter. He said that the NIA moved applications in the Mumbai and Delhi High Courts over the weekend. He stated that they even obtained orders via e-mail. That is to say, by risking the proceedings of an interim bail plea in the Delhi High Court.

Facts of the Case

The Koregaon-Bhima violence case, 2018 involved a 67-year-old Mr Navlakha. He surrendered before the NIA on 14.04.2020. On 23.04.2020, he was sent to Tihar Jail, Delhi under judicial custody. 

Mr Navlakha, then, filed an interim bail plea on Medical grounds. He said that because of COVID-19, it is dangerous for him to stay in jail.

In the last hearing, the Delhi High Court had given time to the NIA to submit its report in response to the bail plea. The NIA filed an Affidavit to oppose the plea. However, the same was done in a very hasty manner.

The Delhi High Court demanded an explanation from the NIA for moving him from Delhi to Mumbai in such haste. They said that it was important to highlight urgency than making proceedings worthless.

Arguments by the Respondent

The Special Public Prosecutor Prakash Shetty argued on behalf of the NIA. He stated that the actions taken by the NIA were necessary as per the urgent situation.

The NIA Investigating Officer explained that he presented an application before the Principal District Judge of NIA on 23.05.2020 for issuance of Production Warrant. On 24.05.2020, the NIA Investigating Officer presented the application before the Special Judge of NIA in Mumbai. The Mumbai High Court issued a ‘Production Warrant’ for the applicant on 26.05.2020 at 11 A.M.

Arguments by the Petitioner

Mr Navlakha’s Counsel was Nitya Ramakrishnan. She claimed that the actions of NIA showed that they want to make the proceedings of the Court worthless. They wanted to take away the Applicant from the Jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court. She expressed discontent over her client’s transfer to Mumbai, being a COVID-19 hotspot.

Mr Navlakha is currently in Taloja Jail in Mumbai.

Court’s Observation 

On 27.05.2020, the Delhi High Court adjourned the case proceedings. The Court then heard the explanation of the NIA officer through video conferencing.

The Delhi High Court ordered that all the documents must be submitted by the next date of hearing on 03.06.2020. These documents include the Application, Production Warrants and other related documents.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -