Delhi HC brings back the Moderation in CBSE Board

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

Facts

The CBSE Board through a board meeting conducted on 24th April, 2017 decided to scrap the policy of moderation adopted for the evaluation of answer scripts. The policy of moderation provides for eliminating the arbitrariness caused due to the examination of answer sheets by different examiners. It might happen that some examiners might be liberal and some may be stricter. Also, some optional subjects might be easier to score and some others would be difficult.

To rule out such differences in the final marks, the policy of moderation stipulates that a sample marking scheme should be distributed among the examiners. In that, provision for grace marks may be awarded for difficult questions or questions with errors. Thereafter, even after they mark, the head examiners would scrutinize random papers checked by every examiner and would double-check to see whether the examiners had corrected the papers according to sample papers. The head examiners had the discretion to require the examiners to give extra grace marks if the answer scripts have been evaluated strictly. Essentially, moderation helps in the preventing the students in getting additional marks and prevents failing in the exams.

But, this policy has been scraped out in a meeting and the students came to know about it only through the media. The CBSE Board did not even care to give an official pronouncement regarding this matter. Also, by the time the Board have taken this decision, the evaluation of the answer sheets had already started and the examiners were following this policy of moderation from 2016 to evaluate the scripts.

Issues

The issue that was raised before the Delhi High Court was whether the sudden change in the policy without any notice and with a retrospective action be allowed to take place?

Would it result in an irreparable injury to the students and should an interim relief be ordered to curb this decision?

Judgment

The court, firstly, condemned the CBSE Board for implementing the change without any proper notice. In the words of the Honourable Court, itself :-

We are deeply concerned with the manner in which the change of policy has been effected without notice to students, Universities etc., which may completely change the course of academic future of the students, especially in Delhi where there is no State Board”


The result of this change was that the students of the State Boards would have an upper hand as the policy of moderation is followed there. Thereafter, it also took into notice as to how it would diminish the chances of students from getting admissions into the Universities including the foreign universities. The court observed that :-

“It cannot be denied that the change in the evaluation policy, that is, denial of moderation may have drastic consequences for the admission offers, which large number of Class XII students who have taken the CBSE courses and examination would suffer. Neither the said foreign universities nor the students were aware that there would be a change in the policy of the CBSE. We are also informed that many students may have also made arrangement of student loans and may have effected payments of large sums to these foreign universities. Grave and irreparable financial loss would also ensure to these students and their families. If the students are unable to fulfill the conditions imposed by foreign universities owing to the changes in the moderation policy, then it would have a devastating impact on their educational prospects”

Thus, the court provided interim relief against the Board’s move to scrap the moderation policy as it was found to be unfair and irresponsible.

Learning Outcome

The board exams would be evaluated on the basis of the moderation policy for the year 2017.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -