Chhattisgarh High Court Judges resolves to donate One Day Salary to PM CARES

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

When the Judges of Chhattisgarh High Court resolved to donate one day salary to CM Relief Fund for Corona vide circular dated 30th March 2020, the same High Court, later on, 22nd April issued another circular.

The circular reads as,

“Given increasing distress situation due to pandemic of COVID-19 in the country, Hon’ble Chief Justice of this High Court has again expressed his desire to give more contribution on behalf of the judiciary of the state of Chhattisgarh by way of donation of one day salary in the public charitable trust set up under the name of ‘Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations Fund (PM CARES).’

Considering the fact and note of the serious issues faced by the states/country in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic, the donation of the one-day salary for PM CARES was only for April 2020.

The circular further stated that the contribution was voluntary. Those officials of the Chhattisgarh High Court who did not wish to contribute has communicated the Accounts Officers or referred the Chhattisgarh High Court through Call/SMS. While those officers/officials of the subordinate judiciary who did not wish to contribute has intimated the concerned authority of the accounts section of the respective districts by mentioning their names, designation with employee code till 24th April 2020. Moreover, non-receipt of the Call/SMS by the indicated date has been taken as their consent to donate.

Observation of the “PM CARES” Fund

PM Citizens Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations (PM CARES) fund was first created by our Prime Minister Mr Narendra Modi on March 28, 2020. PM CARES launched to secure donations for the fight against the COVID-19. The PM CARES has been set up as a Public Charitable Trust. The Prime Minister is the chairman of this Trust. Apart from Modi, his expert members including Defence Minister, Home Minister and Finance Minister will also chair the trust. As chairman of the PM CARES trust, Modi still has the responsibility of sanctioning and approving his ministers’ recommendations.

Why a separate fund when the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund already there?

The justification for the same came from the government that while PMNRF is for all kinds of natural disasters, PM CARES fund is specially meant for the COVID-19 pandemic situation. Any spending from the consolidated Fund of India need to be passed by the parliament, therefore, creation of donation-based fund means that legislature hurdle is taken care of.

A separate fun for COVID-19 relief would encourage more people to contribute to the fund because everyone is impacted by coronavirus outbreak. One can donate as low as Rs.10 in the PM CARES Fund, while the minimum one can donate in PM National Relief Fund is Rs.100.

Opposition leaders too have condemned the move. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor used social media to express his disapproval. He said,

“Why not simply rename PMNRF as PM-CARES, given the PM’s penchant for catchy acronyms, instead of creating a separate public charitable trust whose rules and expenditure are opaque? PM Modi owes the country an explanation for this highly unusual step.”

The Modi administration is unperturbed by the criticism. Joint secretary with the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) emphasizes the question asked by the opposition leader said the PM CARES will be administered like the PMNRF while making the micro-donations acceptable as well. He said the focus is to channelize all the resources to fighting the pandemic and meeting the challenges of the frontline.

It is a great step that assures people that the money that they contribute will be used only for fighting COVID-19 pandemic. Nobody has stopped people from donating to PMNRF. But that money is used for other purposes as well.

Contribution towards PM CARES Fund will be an eligible expenditure under corporate social responsibility (CSR) obligations. Commitments for contributions look like they could well exceed PMNRF’s existing corpus. The Tata group has committed Rs 1,500 crore. Other corporates like Vedanta, Adani, Reliance Industries Limited among others have pledged crores in donations to the fund. So have bankers, sports bodies, sportspersons, Bollywood actors, and other wealthy Indians. With a more democratic and constitutionally sound trust in place, expectations would be that PM CARES becomes a war chest that India can readily rely on emergencies when the future of an entire country is at stake.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -