Chhattisgarh High Court Judges resolves to donate One Day Salary to PM CARES

Must Read

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Follow us

When the Judges of Chhattisgarh High Court resolved to donate one day salary to CM Relief Fund for Corona vide circular dated 30th March 2020, the same High Court, later on, 22nd April issued another circular.

The circular reads as,

“Given increasing distress situation due to pandemic of COVID-19 in the country, Hon’ble Chief Justice of this High Court has again expressed his desire to give more contribution on behalf of the judiciary of the state of Chhattisgarh by way of donation of one day salary in the public charitable trust set up under the name of ‘Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations Fund (PM CARES).’

Considering the fact and note of the serious issues faced by the states/country in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic, the donation of the one-day salary for PM CARES was only for April 2020.

The circular further stated that the contribution was voluntary. Those officials of the Chhattisgarh High Court who did not wish to contribute has communicated the Accounts Officers or referred the Chhattisgarh High Court through Call/SMS. While those officers/officials of the subordinate judiciary who did not wish to contribute has intimated the concerned authority of the accounts section of the respective districts by mentioning their names, designation with employee code till 24th April 2020. Moreover, non-receipt of the Call/SMS by the indicated date has been taken as their consent to donate.

Observation of the “PM CARES” Fund

PM Citizens Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations (PM CARES) fund was first created by our Prime Minister Mr Narendra Modi on March 28, 2020. PM CARES launched to secure donations for the fight against the COVID-19. The PM CARES has been set up as a Public Charitable Trust. The Prime Minister is the chairman of this Trust. Apart from Modi, his expert members including Defence Minister, Home Minister and Finance Minister will also chair the trust. As chairman of the PM CARES trust, Modi still has the responsibility of sanctioning and approving his ministers’ recommendations.

Why a separate fund when the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund already there?

The justification for the same came from the government that while PMNRF is for all kinds of natural disasters, PM CARES fund is specially meant for the COVID-19 pandemic situation. Any spending from the consolidated Fund of India need to be passed by the parliament, therefore, creation of donation-based fund means that legislature hurdle is taken care of.

A separate fun for COVID-19 relief would encourage more people to contribute to the fund because everyone is impacted by coronavirus outbreak. One can donate as low as Rs.10 in the PM CARES Fund, while the minimum one can donate in PM National Relief Fund is Rs.100.

Opposition leaders too have condemned the move. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor used social media to express his disapproval. He said,

“Why not simply rename PMNRF as PM-CARES, given the PM’s penchant for catchy acronyms, instead of creating a separate public charitable trust whose rules and expenditure are opaque? PM Modi owes the country an explanation for this highly unusual step.”

The Modi administration is unperturbed by the criticism. Joint secretary with the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) emphasizes the question asked by the opposition leader said the PM CARES will be administered like the PMNRF while making the micro-donations acceptable as well. He said the focus is to channelize all the resources to fighting the pandemic and meeting the challenges of the frontline.

It is a great step that assures people that the money that they contribute will be used only for fighting COVID-19 pandemic. Nobody has stopped people from donating to PMNRF. But that money is used for other purposes as well.

Contribution towards PM CARES Fund will be an eligible expenditure under corporate social responsibility (CSR) obligations. Commitments for contributions look like they could well exceed PMNRF’s existing corpus. The Tata group has committed Rs 1,500 crore. Other corporates like Vedanta, Adani, Reliance Industries Limited among others have pledged crores in donations to the fund. So have bankers, sports bodies, sportspersons, Bollywood actors, and other wealthy Indians. With a more democratic and constitutionally sound trust in place, expectations would be that PM CARES becomes a war chest that India can readily rely on emergencies when the future of an entire country is at stake.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -