Chhattisgarh High Court Cancels Summer Vacation For The Courts

Must Read

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Follow us

On Thursday i.e. 7th May 2020, the Chhattisgarh High Court issued an order to cancel the summer vacation for the High Court and the other Sub-ordinates Courts.

The decision taken by the Chhattisgarh High Court is to compensate all the work loss of the Courts due to the lockdown.

The order stated that the High Court has decided to dispense with the Summer Vacation from 18th May 2020 to 12th June 2020. It also stated that except for the holidays already declared, the rest of the days during this period shall be treated as working days.

Likewise, Chhattisgarh High Court, other High Courts and Sub-ordinates Courts of the Country have resolved to cancel the Summer Vacation.

Previously announced by the respective Courts, only extreme urgent cases will be taken into consideration.

Court’s Vacation

How much of vacation do our judges need? This question generally arises when we think of all the delayed and end number of pending cases in our courts.

On average, the Supreme Court functions 193 days, High Court 210 days and other Sub-ordinates Courts works 245 days. Courts are further closed on special occasions like Holi, Dussehra, Pongal, etc depending on the state.

Despite these holidays, courts are closed for considerable periods during the Summer i.e. in the month of June.

Arguments against long breaks

Many people strongly oppose the practice of long court vacations, particularly in summer. They believe that long court vacation is a colonial practice and should be stopped. Since we no longer have English Judges who need to visit their homeland for a long period.

The people who oppose this practise also focuses more on the pending severe matters or cases. They think that the courts should work for a long hour to meet the needs of the country.

This argument makes complete sense when we compare the courts with other institutions. The judiciary cannot be made to view the holiday as an entitlement when the system has become dysfunctional.

Argument favour long breaks

No doubt, case reading and its analysis is a tough task and can take a long time. Those in favour always continued to do the same because according to the judges are always overburdened.

Judges always overloaded with their works and work extremely for a long hour. Sub-ordinates Courts Judges works 6 days a week, unlike the High Court and Supreme Court Judges who work for five days a week.

Judges spend evening, nights, weekend in reading files, writing orders and reading other judgements.

Court’s Decision

In view, there is no specific reason why the Judiciary should continue to take a long vacation. Judges are no different from other professions when it comes to hard work.

Though, it is equally important for Judges to decide with a clean and relaxed mind. Taking these long breaks not help the system in disposing cases. So, even if the vacation granted to the Courts, it should not be done en masse.

We need to evolve a practice where the courts will function throughout the year. But individual judges will get the time off to ensure they will not suffer burnout.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -