Chhattisgarh HC Sustains Dismissal of Judicial Officer Due to False Allegations Against HC Judges

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

The Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the termination of a Trial Court judge for filing mala fide criminal cases against the senior judges of the High Court. The Court emphasized that such actions shall tarnish the reputation of the institution as well as malign the judiciary itself.

Brief Facts of the Case

The petitioner, a Civil Judge, appointed in 2005 adjudicated as a member of Lower Judicial Service in Chhattisgarh. The petitioner was served with a show-cause notice due to his conduct and language used while corresponding with higher authorities. The petitioner also filed criminal cases through his wife against former Chief Justice and senior judges of the High Court under sections of criminal conspiracy in the Indian Penal Code. On 29.03.2016, the Full Bench of the High Court dismissed him for services based on the report submitted by the Registrar General.

The petitioner contended the dismissal to be per se illegal, arbitrary and vindictive. It was also contended that an inferior authority passed the order without constituting any inquiry under Article 311 of the Constitution.

Court’s Observations 

The Court accepted the submissions of the respondents alleging petitioner’s misfit behaviour since the appointment. The petitioner had passed adverse comments casting serious aspersions and insinuations against his colleagues and higher officials. Thus, the Court invoked the provisions of Article 311(2)(b) which empowers the authority to dismiss a person without inquiry. The petitioner’s conduct spoke for itself as to not qualify for a judicial officer.

Further, the Court acknowledged the frivolous and fabricated complaints filed against IPS officers and sitting MLA without prior permission from the High Court. This cannot be treated as a prudent act on the part of a judicial officer entrusted with responsibility. The Court remarked- “It is always expected that a judicial officer discharges his work and duties in tranquillity and conducts in a manner as if he is a hermit.”

Moreover, the Court noted that the courage of subordinate judiciary to malign the senior officials could jeopardize the interests of the institution. The petitioner always has an aggressive approach and has used foul language in most of his averments. Hence, the petitioner interfered with his judicial duties for advancing personal ambitions. The Court, thus, asserted that- “Considering the independence of the judiciary, personal and official conduct of men who preside over the most important branch of State has to be approached with care and caution”.

Court’s Order  

Justice P. Sam Koshy pronounced the final order in the four-year-long proceedings. The Court upheld the dismissal from services while referring to the Full Court recommendation under Article 311(2) of the Constitution. It has also disposed of all the criminal cases filed by the petitioner against higher judicial officers. It asserted- “It is a case where there are a series of correspondences repeatedly casting serious insinuations, making unscrupulous allegations and obnoxious comments all of which are false, scurrilous and malicious against the Chief Justice and other senior judges of the High Court.”


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -