Chhattisgarh HC Sustains Dismissal of Judicial Officer Due to False Allegations Against HC Judges

Must Read

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years...

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Follow us

The Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the termination of a Trial Court judge for filing mala fide criminal cases against the senior judges of the High Court. The Court emphasized that such actions shall tarnish the reputation of the institution as well as malign the judiciary itself.

Brief Facts of the Case

The petitioner, a Civil Judge, appointed in 2005 adjudicated as a member of Lower Judicial Service in Chhattisgarh. The petitioner was served with a show-cause notice due to his conduct and language used while corresponding with higher authorities. The petitioner also filed criminal cases through his wife against former Chief Justice and senior judges of the High Court under sections of criminal conspiracy in the Indian Penal Code. On 29.03.2016, the Full Bench of the High Court dismissed him for services based on the report submitted by the Registrar General.

The petitioner contended the dismissal to be per se illegal, arbitrary and vindictive. It was also contended that an inferior authority passed the order without constituting any inquiry under Article 311 of the Constitution.

Court’s Observations 

The Court accepted the submissions of the respondents alleging petitioner’s misfit behaviour since the appointment. The petitioner had passed adverse comments casting serious aspersions and insinuations against his colleagues and higher officials. Thus, the Court invoked the provisions of Article 311(2)(b) which empowers the authority to dismiss a person without inquiry. The petitioner’s conduct spoke for itself as to not qualify for a judicial officer.

Further, the Court acknowledged the frivolous and fabricated complaints filed against IPS officers and sitting MLA without prior permission from the High Court. This cannot be treated as a prudent act on the part of a judicial officer entrusted with responsibility. The Court remarked- “It is always expected that a judicial officer discharges his work and duties in tranquillity and conducts in a manner as if he is a hermit.”

Moreover, the Court noted that the courage of subordinate judiciary to malign the senior officials could jeopardize the interests of the institution. The petitioner always has an aggressive approach and has used foul language in most of his averments. Hence, the petitioner interfered with his judicial duties for advancing personal ambitions. The Court, thus, asserted that- “Considering the independence of the judiciary, personal and official conduct of men who preside over the most important branch of State has to be approached with care and caution”.

Court’s Order  

Justice P. Sam Koshy pronounced the final order in the four-year-long proceedings. The Court upheld the dismissal from services while referring to the Full Court recommendation under Article 311(2) of the Constitution. It has also disposed of all the criminal cases filed by the petitioner against higher judicial officers. It asserted- “It is a case where there are a series of correspondences repeatedly casting serious insinuations, making unscrupulous allegations and obnoxious comments all of which are false, scurrilous and malicious against the Chief Justice and other senior judges of the High Court.”


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -