Calcutta HC responds to BJP’s challenge of Election Process to be held for Howrah Municipal Corporation

Must Read

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions,...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by...

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Follow us

A writ petition was filed by the Bharatiya Janta Party to challenge the Election process to be held to the Howrah Municipal Corporation. The party challenged the publication of draft order on 20th December 2019 in terms of Rule 3 and 4 of the West Bengal Municipal Elections (Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1994. The aforementioned Rules lay down the procedure of determining the total number of reserved seats as well as the method of identifying the words to be included in the SC/ST and women category.

According to the Petitioner, the District Election Officer (DEO), Howrah did not consider the objection filed by the party on 2nd January 2020 for reducing the total number of constituencies in the Howrah-Bally civic jurisdiction from 85 to 66 seats. The petitioner claims that the election areas of the constituencies were constructed to favour the ruling party.

The Writ Petition was heard on the 28th January 2020 by the Honorable Justice Rajasekhar Mantha.

Arguments of the Learned Counsel

The learned Counsel for the West Bengal State Election Commission has made the following arguments;

  1. The learned counsel argues that the Election Commission relies on Rule 4(3) of the aforementioned West Bengal Municipal Elections (Reservation of Seats) Rules which states that the Commission is only required to consider the objection and dispose of them accordingly. They also submitted the photocopy of the order that shows that appropriate consideration was effected by the Election Commission to be shared with the Counsel for the Petitioner.
  2. The Election Commission also relies on the SC Judgement in the case State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.-Vs.-P.S.S Samity in 1995. The judgement stated the following aspects to consider;
  3. an examination of the Sections 8 (Readjustment of Number of Seats) and Section 9 (Delimitation of Seats) of the Delimitation Commission Act cannot be subjected to scrutiny by any court of the law.
  4. If the orders under the Sections 8 and 9 were not treated as final then any voter could hold up the election indefinitely by questioning the delimitation of the constituencies Court by Court
  5. A similar judgement was upheld by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Sk. Maison & Ors.-Vs.-The State of West Bengal & Ors. in 2009. The Judgement expressly states that “the High Court…must resist the temptation of interfering with an election at the intermediary stage of granting relief.” 
  6. The learned counsel also cited Article 243 (z)(g) of the Constitution of India which bars interference by courts in electoral matters. Also, any grievance related to the Election process should be challenged by filing an Election Petition before the District Judge (prescribed authority) in this case.

The learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the order handed over in the Court by the Election Commission concerning the objection filed on 2nd January 2020 was not shared before this day.

The Court’s Order

After reviewing the petition and the arguments on the behalf of the Election Commission, the Court is of the view that the petitioner will be able to find their remedy “after the Election process is completed before the District Judge under the provisions of the West Bengal Municipal Elections Act, 1994.” 

The Court has ordered the Election Commission to file an affidavit-in-opposition within 2 weeks from the date and fixed the case for hearing after three weeks.

[googlepdf url=”http://libertatem.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BJP-VS-THE-STATE-OF-WB_watermark.pdf” download=”Download Judgement PDF” ]


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -