Calcutta HC denies Deportation of Rohingya Couple until the Writ Petition is disposed “in the spirit of humanity”

Must Read

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

Follow us

Context and Facts

A report by the Human rights Watch enumerates that 671,000 Rohingya Muslims have fled Myanmar as of August 2017. The members of the ‘Rohingya’ community are fleeing the State’s systematic military campaign of ethnic cleansing. The community is one of the largest stateless communities in the entire world.

A writ petition was filed in the Calcutta High Court by Abdur Sukur who has been detained by the State along with his wife Anowara Begum. The couple belongs to the Rohingya community. The petition is against the decision of the state to deport the couple back to Myanmar that has an ongoing slaughter of the said Rohingya community. The respondents are the State of West Bengal and others.

Arguments of the Learned Counsel

Arguments for the Petition made by the learned counsel, Mr. Rachit Lakhmani and Mr Indrajeet Dey, point out that the deportation of the petitioners back to Myanmar would definitely lead to their death at the hands of the State Military.

The couple was arrested in 2017 when they had entered India from Bangladesh and were on their way to Delhi for a hearing in the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). The learned counsel argues that the couple has already completed their sentence in the Dum Dum jail for the alleged offences and now the respondents are trying to deport them despite the apparent threat to their life.

The counsel for the respondents argues that the writ petition is “vague” about the period of the sentence that the petitioners have undergone in the Dum Dum jail. They state that the Ministry of the External Affairs of the Union of India is an important party and therefore they should be present in the hearing.

The Court Order

The court proceedings were held on the 24th December 2019 under Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharya.

The Court decidedly states that the in view of the “imminent plight” and the threat of life, the petitioners should be provided “minimum protection” until the writ petition is decided. The court also directs the respondents to ensure that the petitioners are provided “basic amnesties, compatible with a life worthy of respect.” The advocates for the petitioners were granted permission to have access to the petitioners under the supervision of the respondents.

The court has also asked the respondents to file their affidavit(s)-in-opposition within the 10th of January, 2020; giving time till the 17th of January for any replies from the petitioners. The Court and has set the next hearing date on 2oth January 2020.

On 27th December 2019, the United Nations passed a resolution demanding that the State of Myanmar create the appropriate conditions for the safe return of the Rohingya Muslims back to the country. The UN General Assembly has also called for an immediate stop to the killing and inciting of hatred. Thousands of Rohingya Muslims have fled the state and are living as refugees; stateless and disowned. Among these are Abdur Sukur and his wife searching for right to life.

[googlepdf url=”https://libertatem.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Calcutta-High-Court-Denies-Deportation-of-a-Rohingya-Couple-until-the-Writ-Petition-is-disposed-“in-the-spirit-of-humanity”.pdf” download=”Download Judgement PDF” width=”100%” height=”900″]


Contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now. You can also join our Team of Courtroom and regularly contribute cases like the above one.

For more Courtroom Updates, check out our Courtroom Page

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -