[COVID-19] Calcutta HC issued New Instructions amid Coronavirus Lockdown

Must Read

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and...

Follow us

In the light of a Nationwide Coronavirus Lockdown announced on 24th March 2020 by the Government of India as well as the Government of West Bengal, the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the court has issued further instructions vide Notification No. 1506-RG.

Instructions for Extremely Urgent Matters during Coronavirus Lockdown

Following the lockdown, the lawyers, litigants, etc will not be able to physically attend any court proceedings. Therefore, the Court has issued that “court proceedings of extreme urgent matters may be conducted via video-conferencing through skype conference call”

The Advocate-on-record (AOR)/Party-in-person is required to file a scanned copy of the petition/application and documents along with Form A or Form B as is required through [email protected]

The documents should also include a prayer for “exemption from filing duly affirmed affidavit with an undertaking that deficit court fees will be paid within 48 hours of the Calcutta High Court opening and attaining normalcy.”

After all the required documents are submitted, the Advocate-on-Record/Party-in-Person will have to file a separate signed and verified application containing a synopsis of the extremely urgent matter and mail it to the above-mentioned email id latest by 2 pm on the day preceding the day of the sitting of Hon’ble Benches.

Instructions for the Filling of Applications during Coronavirus Lockdown

The application must contain

Case-details

Bench-details

Contact details of the AOR/party-in-person; email-id, mobile number, alternate number, residence/office address, pin code and police station

A separate paragraph providing consent that the matter can be taken up in the video-conferencing mode.

AOR/Party-in-person must also specify whether he would link through his own desktop/mobile/laptop or use the facility in the High Court premises.

Skype contact details have to be provided in the application for video-conferencing

After the relevant cases have been approved by the appropriate benches for urgent hearing, a cause-list will be published on the website of the Hon’ble High Court under the ‘Notification’ column by evening hours on the day preceding the sitting of the concerned Bench or the very same day on the Leave of the Bench.

Calcutta High Court, Advocate Cursed Judge With Coronavirus, andaman and nicobar islands, Calcutta HC issued New Instructions amid Coronavirus LockdownFurther Instructions on Video-Conferencing during Coronavirus Lockdown

After the case(s) have been taken on board, the concerned AOR/Party-in-person will be provided with an intimation regarding the time of sitting of the Hon’ble Bench(es) and approximate time of the hearing of their case(s) on the mobile number and email id provided in the application.

The AOR/Party-in-person should keep the concerned mobile free during the indicated time as the High Court Registry will call on the shared mobile number when the matter is to be called for hearing through video-conferencing as per the cause list.

If the AOR/Party-in-person is not able to connect through video-conferencing due to non-availability of hardware or network on a given date, then the matter will be listed on the next date of the sitting of any Bench.

The video-conferencing facility will be made available to the concerned AOR/Party-in-Person in the High Court Premises if mentioned in the application. However, everyone is advised to “refrain from exercising the option of participating in the hearing through the Video-conferencing facility available at the High Court premises as that would entail unnecessary and avoidable travel through public spaces.”

The AOR/Party-in-Persons are requested to not send emails to any other mail id, other than the above-mentioned id.

The Registry will keep the offices open with skeletal staff only to hold the Hon’ble Bench for extremely urgent cases and facilitate all matters that may be connected to smoothly holding of such Hon’ble Bench, by video-conferencing or otherwise.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -