Bombay High Court Rules Women In Live-In Relationship Are Entitle To Claim Maintenance From Their Partner

Must Read

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s...

Follow us

Bombay High Court on Friday ruled that a woman in a live-in relationship with a man for 15 years is entitled to maintenance if they share their finances and responsibility of household chores. This decision provides more rights to women in a society dominated by men.

Facts of the case

Woman Jayashri was married earlier and even had kids from that marriage. Her husband deserted her 5 years after their marriage. Jayashri was a vegetable seller business and her shop was right next to Shamshuddin’s shop. Two came close and after a few years, Jayashri moved in with Shamshuddin along with her children. Jayashri’s kid addressed Shamshuddin as father and they started living as a married couple. Couple pooled in their finances and shared the household expenses and chores. They introduced themselves as husband and wife in spite of not being formally married. After living together for 15 years, the relationship between the couple soured and they decided to go their separate ways. Jayashri citing her destituteness filed a maintenance petition against Shamshuddin in a magistrate court under the Domestic Violence Act. The magistrate directed Shamshuddin to pay two thousand rupees to Jayashri per month. On appeal to the Session’s Court, the said order was reversed and the Court held that the live-in relationship of a couple cannot be construed as a relationship in “nature of marriage.” This decision was appealed against in Bombay High Court.

The Decision of the Court

Single Judge Bench of Justice Bharati Dangre after examining all the evidence on the record and keeping in mind the facts and circumstances of the case ruled that a woman living in a live-in relationship with a man for 15 years makes her eligible to claim maintenance from her partner. Shamshuddin’s lawyer in his arguments tried to question the character of Jayashri and said that merely living together under a shared household is not the only test determining whether the relationship between a couple is that of marriage. Justice Dangre said that “It must be noted that the applicant (Jayashri) never claimed that she was married Samshuddin. It is seen that the duo projected themselves to the world as husband and wife and not only that there was an economic exchange between them, they also carried out business activities together. She was helped by Samshuddin in raising her children, who referred him as a father.” Moreover, replying to respondent’s argument over the character of Jayashri Hon’ble judge said that “this Court is of the opinion that merely throwing doubt on the character of a woman like Jayashri would not make a man escape the liability, specifically when he has shared the same household with her and treated her like his wife for a long period.” Justice Dangre increased the maintenance from two thousand to four thousand and instructed Shamshuddin to pay the same to Jayashri every month.

Learning of the Case

From this case, we learn that a woman in a live-in relationship for 15 years is entitled to claim compensation provided they project themselves as a couple to the world and share economic duties of the household. Domestic Violence Act enacted in 2005 is a benevolent law for protecting women from violence and term abuse should be interpreted broadly to fulfil the purpose of the Act.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -