Bombay HC to Directly Address the Grievances of Public Regarding COVID- 19 Crisis Management

Must Read

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Follow us

The COVID-19 affected persons would criticize the work of civic authorities in media. The reports included a lack of essential services and quarantine centres. Hence, the order in the present matter informs the public to approach the Court directly.

Brief Facts of the Case 

In March 2020, the Union Government declared nation-wide lockdown owing to the COVID- 19. The State Governments had to ensure medical facilities and provide essential services. Maharashtra, with high population density, has been combatting at its full strength. However, the aggrieved persons approach the news channels to address the short-comings.

Hence, the Bombay High Court has taken suo moto cognizance in the present matter. The judge inspected the rural places of Maharashtra in Jalna and Aurangabad.

Court’s Observations

The Court has noted no concrete steps to mitigate the alarming situation. The number of infected persons per day has been increasing in the districts. It observed decreasing cases in cities whereas the increase in the rural areas. The authorities failed to regulate the commutation between the areas. The infected people shifted from cities to their native place despite lockdown. Moreover, the village culture did not allow the information to reach the authorities.

The inspection revealed that no strict checking took place at the inter-district check-posts. It asserted that the authorities must follow up on the implementation of orders. A person also apprised the Court of the arbitrary mechanism of the authorities. Hence, the complainant must invoke the provisions under the special enactments. This will ensure an unbiased and impartial atmosphere within the staff members.

The Court has remarked on the video clip of an infected person covered by news channels. The person complained of breathlessness and an inadequate supply of oxygen. Similar incidents have been reported on several occasions. Thus, it stated- “When there is such kind of grievance, it becomes the duty of the concerned authorities to fix the responsibility and give the complaint to the police as such conduct is not less offence of than culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Unless action is taken against such persons, others will not improve their conduct.”

The Court has also received complaints against private hospitals. The administration charged expensive bills without any treatment to the patients. Moreover, the families also reported unnatural death in the hospital. Hence, the Court issued directions to install CCTV cameras in the isolation cells. Further, the court addressed the vulnerability of poor people during the pandemic. They cannot afford private hospitals and the public hospitals had no availability. They have no choice but to continue at their residential places. This also created ‘hotspots’ in rural areas which already lack medical facilities.

Court’s Orders

Justice M G. Sewlikar and Justice T. V. Talwade pronounced the judgement. On the basis of observations, the court found direct intervention appropriate. The affected persons can bring forth grievances like lack of essential services and unfair practices. They may also complain against the civic authorities and the hospital administration.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -