Bombay HC: Procedure for Claiming Juvenility Can Be Invoked at Any Stage Even After Final Disposal of Case

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

The Court issued writ of Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of Constitution of India for directing Respondent to exonerate the Petitioner. It was prayed to the Court for issuing direction, order or writ for pending hearing and disposal of the Petition regarding the inquiry of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. Such Order is necessary for evaluation of the claim of validity of Juvenility of the Petitioner in the case of Arvindkumar Bhaiyalal Sahu v. State of Maharashtra. 

Brief Facts

The Petitioner was convicted for the offence punishable under section 302 of IPC and thereby underwent 10 years of imprisonment since 07.10.2009. The Petitioner was released  in 2017 on parole wherein material came across revealed petitioner age below 18 years at the time of the commission of the offence. Such proposition was verified on 21/11/2019, the Section Education Officer, Allahabad produced a copy of school register, transfer certificate of Late R.P.J.High School, family register and even school mark-sheet of 2005-2006, D.O.B is 7.7.1992 but the incident happened on 6.10.2009 shows that the Petitioner was 17 years of age.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The counsel pleaded before the Court that the Petitioner was a juvenile at the time of the commission of the crime and therefore must be treated as a juvenile in accordance with law under section 2(l) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. Consequently, he deserves to be released from custody since he was in jail from 07.10.2009.  The counsel also substantiated his argument with the assistance of a document to prove the claim of juvenility at the time of the incident.  

Court’s Observation

The Court took the reference of Amit Singh Vs. State of Maharashtra which invoked Section 7A of the Act defining the procedure which must be complied for claiming juvenility raised before any court of law at any stage even after final disposal of the case which was inserted by way of Amendment Act 33 of 2006.

In Addition of this provision, other provision of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007, (in short `the Rules’) Rule 98 r/w Section 20 of the Act as amended by the Amendment Act, 2006 furnish that even after final disposal of case juvenile in conflict, State Government or Board could review the case claiming for juvenility either suo motu or in application and thereby pass an order under Section 64 of the Act for release of juvenile whose imprisonment period exceeded maximum period i.e 3 years provided under Section 15 of the Act.

The Court took the reference of Rule 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 for the procedure in determining the age of juvenile by Court or Board within 30 days from the date of application and decide juvenility prima facie on the basis of physical appearance or documents and send him to an observation home or in jail.

Court’s Decision 

The Court concluded the matter by referring it to Juvenile Justice Board, Mumbai for making enquiry in ascertaining the claim of juvenility of the petitioner in accordance with the law and produced the report within 14 weeks from the date of receipt. 

Click here to view the Judgement.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -