Riya Jain

The letter patent appeal has been filed under clause 15 of Letter Patent against the judgment and order dated 10.08.20 passed by learned Single Judge in which petition was dismissed in the case of Divyeshkumar Ashokbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat C/LPA/538/2020.

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of Karsan Shivaji Sanghar v. Ashapura Mines Chem Limited. Brief Facts The workman was appointed to the post of supervisor and was rendering service for more than

Excerpt: The writ petition was filed by the petitioner before this court to issue any writ, direction or order for quashing and setting aside the impugned detention order passed by the respondent, detaining authority dated on 25.07.2020 under the Gujarat Prevention of Antisocial Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as

Excerpt The writ petition was instituted under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The Petitioner had requested before this Court that Respondent No.1 be instructed to dispose of the criminal application in an expeditious manner under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 in the case of Bank of Baroda v.

Excerpt: The appeal was filed under clause 15 in the Letter of Patent against the order passed by Single Judge of the Court dated 17.09.2020 via a writ petition application which held that the Court refused to interfere with the interim order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Ahmedabad (”DRT”)

Excerpt The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus or certiorari or any other writ, direction, order for quashing and setting aside the order dated 17.12.2016 passed by Respondent no.2 with respect to termination of the service of the

Excerpt: The criminal appeal was filed against the impugned order passed by the learned Special Judge,  POCSO, Amreli in Special (POCSO) Case No. 17 of 2017 convicted for the offense punishable under section 323 of IPC r/w section 114 of Indian Evidence Act, section 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012

EXCERPT: The writ petition was filed by the petitioner for being aggrieved by the fact that he had not been granted the benefit of Unavailed Privilege Leave of 300 days to his credit after his retirement from service in the case of Hirabhai Nanabhai Bhoi v. State of Gujarat. BRIEF

EXCERPT: The civil application was filed against the order of detention dated 21.9.2020 passed by detaining authority herein respondent under section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985. Detaining the detenu defined under section 2(c) of this Act in the case of Jilabhai S/O Khodabhai Kamabhai

Excerpt: The petition under Article 226 of Constitution was filed against the order dated 03.03.2020 issued by Respondent no.2, Development Commissioner, Gandhinagar approving such order passed by District Development Officer, Mehsana dated on 26.08.2019 wherein Petitioner has been removed from the post of Sarpanch of  Langhnaj Gram Panchayat under Section