Bombay High Court Declares ‘ISKCON’ a Well-Known Trademark Under the Trade Marks Act, 1999

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

The authorities of the ISKCON temple filed a suit for infringement of their trademark. The plaintiff also asked the Court to declare that ‘ISKCON’ is a well-known trademark.

Issue

The plaintiff had filed a suit at the Bombay High Court to get a permanent injunction. In this case, the plaintiff alleged that the respondent authorities infringed the ‘ISKCON’ trademark. Herein, the Iskcon Apparel Private Limited already changed their name to the Alcis Private Limited, but the company sold its products through the online mode in the name of ‘ISKCON’.

Arguments Advanced

Mr. Kamod appeared on behalf of the petitioner. He stated that the Late Acharya founded the ‘ISKCON’ in 1966 in New York. He started the Krishna Consciousness Movement. The movement started in name of International Society for Krishna Consciousness. He said that movement got popular within a short time.

Plaintiff submitted that the first built temple was in 1971 in India. The plaintiff uses the ISKCON as a trademark for advertising its goods and services. The name as a trademark is used extensively and continuously. He spent a lot of money on advertisement, promotion and marketing. This was to make the trademark more popular.

The plaintiff also owns a website: www.iskcon.org. This website has been operational from 1994. The plaintiff has also owned other 12 domains in the name of ‘ISKCON’. The Counsel further stated that the ‘ISKCON’ deals with a wide range of products. Thus, ‘ISKCON’ enjoys a goodwill globally.

The Counsel submitted that ‘ISKCON’ fulfils all conditions to be a well- known trademark. ISKCON also fulfils all necessary conditions under Section 11(4) and 11(7) of the Trademarks Act, 1999. To support its arguments, the plaintiff relied on the case of ITC Ltd. v. Rani Sati Foods Pvt. Ltd. 2018 of Bombay High Court.

Court’s Analysis

The Court said that there is no doubt that ‘ISKCON’ is a well-known trademark. It requires the highest degree of protection. The ‘ISKCON’ trademark is closely associated with the plaintiff. The documents produced before the Court clearly showed that trademark has gained immense popularity. It also earned goodwill across the globe. The trademark is only associated with the plaintiff. The plaintiff has initiated proceedings against the misuse of Trade Mark. Thus, it has become successful in enforcing its rights in its Trade Mark.

Court’s Decision

The judges passed the order in favour of the plaintiff and stated that-
(a) The plaintiff’s trademark ISKCON has wide acceptability;
(b) the plaintiff’s trademark also is famous across the globe;
(c) the plaintiff is using trademark from its inception;
(d) the plaintiff has taken actions against several infringers in the past.

Therefore, the aforementioned grounds, satisfy the provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Thus, the Court held that ISKCON is a ‘well-known’ trademark in India. ISKCON is a well-known trademark under Section 2(1) (zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -