Bombay HC seeks reply on PIL alleging Authorities are randomly picking up people in Nagpur and sending them to quarantine

Must Read

The OTT Code: Streaming Now

OTT platforms are gaining immense popularity in India. With the increase in popularity, a need to regulate them was...

Explained: Events That Led To the 2020 Rajasthan Political Crisis

The government has been toppled in the state of Rajasthan, following which petitions have been filed in the High...

Job Post: Vacancy in Equinix for Director, Legal, Corporate

About Equinix and ONELegal Equinix connects the world’s leading businesses to their customers, employees and partners inside the world’s most...

The PIL was filed at the Bombay High Court’s Nagpur bench in respect to allegations that there are non-compliance and non-observance of guidelines time to time issued by the Union of India/ICMR related to COVID19.

Petitioner’s Submissions

The counsel on behalf of petitioner contended that authorities in ‘Satranjipura’ and ‘Momimpura’ cities of Nagpur are randomly picking up people and making them quarantine. They are forced to remain in quarantine even though they are not falling in the categories of ‘High-Risk Contacts’ and ‘Low-Risk Contacts’.

He also contended that if any person does not fall in any of the risk categories and then forcing him to quarantine is a violation of his fundamental rights under Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution.

The counsel for the petitioner also stated that there are quarantined people in MLA Hostel and VNIT which are already crowded places which are a violation of guidelines issued by Union of India that states explicitly

“quarantine facility shall preferably be placed away from the crowded and populated area.”

Respondent’s Arguments

The respondent’s counsel contended that Corporation is strictly following the guidelines of ICMR/ Union of India. The doctors from Health Corporation also stated that every care had been taken before sending the said person to quarantine. The respondent also sought two days to file a reply for this petition.

Court’s Decision

The court gave two days to the respondent for filing a reply and provided an advance copy to the petitioner as well.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

The OTT Code: Streaming Now

OTT platforms are gaining immense popularity in India. With the increase in popularity, a need to regulate them was...

Explained: Events That Led To the 2020 Rajasthan Political Crisis

The government has been toppled in the state of Rajasthan, following which petitions have been filed in the High Court and the Supreme Court....

Job Post: Vacancy in Equinix for Director, Legal, Corporate

About Equinix and ONELegal Equinix connects the world’s leading businesses to their customers, employees and partners inside the world’s most connected data centers in 55...

Job Post: Vacancy at Kohler for AM/DM – Legal

Skills/Requirements Roles / Responsibilities. Reviews, drafts and negotiates all kind of agreements, like Lease and License Agreement, Service Agreements, non-disclosure agreements, Consultancy Agreement, Distribution Agreement,...

Job Post: Vacancy for Senior Associate at Juris & Juris

Email Subject (must): Application for Senior Associate Website: www.jurisnjuris.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/juris-juris Eligibility: Minimum 3 yrs of experience with good drafting skill (Preferably from Science background) Duration of engagement: Min....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -