Alimony given under Domestic Violence Act can’t be replaced by 125 Cr.P.C, says Bombay High Court

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

Case– Rekha Prakash Dangi v. Her Husband

The Bombay High Court recently clarified the position of law pertaining to Alimony. While scrutinizing the whether an order passed for alimony under section 125 Cr.P.C is to be followed, or, whether an order passed for alimony under Domestic Violence Act, is to be followed, the court held that both the orders stand independently of each other.

The bench comprised of

The single judge bench of Justice Shalini Phansalkar Joshi was hearing the counter writ examining the question related to alimony filed by both husband and wife.

Facts

Rekha Prakash Dangi, aged 26, (petitioner’s wife) had filed a maintenance petition under section 125 of Cr.P.C in 2010, which was decided on January 20, 2016. Court had allowed the petition and awarded an alimony of Rs. 6,000 for wife and Rs. 4,000 for the minor daughter, every month.

While this petition under section 125 Cr.P.C was pending, another petition under the Domestic Violence Act was filed in 2012 wherein an interim maintenance was sought. Court partly allowed the petition on July 26, 2012, and awarded maintenance of Rs. 8,000 and Rs. 5,000 to the wife and minor daughter.

While the proceeding under section 125 Cr.P.C was going on the husband indicated the alimony decree passed by the family court under the Domestic Violence Act, the court recorded that the husband was already paying the amount but nowhere referred that the order of alimony passed in the proceedings of domestic violence act would replace the order passed under Section 125 Cr.P.C

Section 20 (1) (d) of the Domestic Violence Act states- 

‘In proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, the Magistrate may direct the Respondent to pay the maintenance to the aggrieved person as well as her children, if any, including an order under or in addition to an order of maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. or any other law for the time being in force.

Section 36 of the Domestic Violence Act states- 

‘The provisions of the Domestic Violence Act shall be in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law for the time being in force.’

“Therefore, it follows that the awarded amount of alimony under the Domestic Violence Act cannot be replaced by the amount awarded for alimony under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.”

Judgement

Court held that both the orders of alimony have to be compiled. Court held that both the orders stand independently of each other.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -