High Court Cannot Nullify Marriage Between Two Consenting Adults: Supreme Court

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that High Court cannot nullify marriage between two consenting adults in the controversial Hadiya case. By pronouncing this decision the court upheld the fundamental rights given to people of India by Indian constitution.

Facts

A 24-year-old girl Akhila pursuing Bachelor of Homeopathic medicine and surgery from a college in Salem went missing from her friend’s house on 6th January 2017. It was discovered that Akhila attended her college on 6th January wearing Hijab following which her parents lodged a police complain. Akhila’s father filed a writ of Habeas Corpus at Kerala High Court. Akhila was brought before the court on 19th January where she said that she had converted to Islam by her own free will and taken the name Hadiya. She further stated that she converted because she was impressed by her friend’s timely prayers and good character and added that she had been following Islam for three years without announcing the change. From 7th January she had been staying with Sainaba a social worker who worked with an educational and conversion center known as Sathya Sarani in Manjeri, Malappuram. Hearing this court rejected the writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Akhila’s father saying she was staying at the institution of her own free will and there was no illegal confinement.

Akhila’s father filed a second petition on 17 August 2016 alleging that her daughter was being taken to another country for marriage with a Muslim man. Court immediately passed an interim order keeping Akhila under surveillance to ensure she stays in the country. On the day of hearing, Akhila tells the court that she did not want to return to her parent’s house. Akhila’s father revealed his concern for her safety following which court sent her to a hostel in Ernakulam. In September Akhila tells the court that she was being made to stay at the hostel and she should be allowed to stay in place of her choosing. She does not possess a passport and cannot travel to any foreign country.

On 21st December Akhila walks in the court with a stranger who turns out to be her husband. They met through a matrimonial website and married on 19th December. Judges of Kerala High Court were livid with rage and not satisfied with the manner in which marriage was performed and sent Akhila to a ladies hostel with no access to mobile phone. On 24 May Kerala High Court called her wedding a sham and nullified it. Moreover, Court said that wedding could be a conspiracy to take her out of the country.

Akhila’s husband appealed to Supreme Court against the order of Kerala High Court. Supreme Court herd the matter on two issues

Issues of the Case

  1. Can High Court sou motto nullify a marriage in a habeas corpus petition?
  2. Can a third party approach court in a case of marriage between two consenting adults?

Decision

Apex Court noted the observation of High Court that there were radical organizations in the country trying to brainwash young Indian girls in. Learned council Kapil Sibal for petitioners maintained that bride and groom had met through a matrimonial website, marriage was valid and there was no element of undue influence or forced consent. Shyam Divan on other side argued that High Court under article 226 has the inherent jurisdiction to annul a marriage where the solemnization of marriage is carried out in the background of poverty or illiteracy of one party.

After listening to both the sides Apex Court held

“ the High Court should not have annulled the marriage between Shafin Jahan and Hadiya alias Akhila Asokan, in a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. We say so because in the present appeal, by special leave, we had directed the personal presence of Hadiya alias Akhila Ashokan she appeared before this Court on 27th November 2017, and admitted her marriage with appellant No.1.”

Learning of the Case

From this case we learn 2 things first, that court cannot annul a marriage between two consenting adults in a habeas corpus petition. Second, every Indian has the right to choose his or her partner in a marriage.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -