Court convicted ex-Deputy Mayor and 3 others in a fake encounter case

Must Read

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner....

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Follow us

A 24-year-old fake encounter case in which ex-Deputy Mayor of Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh and 3 others were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment by Additional Sessions Judge Swapna Singh on Friday, June 29, 2018. Two of the other accused mentioned in the charge sheet had died earlier.

Facts of the case

Former Mayor of Lucknow Abhay Seth, ex-general secretary of Aliganj traders’ union, Ashok Mishra and two constables, Ram Chander Singh Chandel and Shivbhushan Tiwari were involved in a heinous conspiracy to kill and defame Aliganj resident Gopal Mishra on February 26, 1994. A story fits for a Bollywood potboiler that rocked Lucknow in which BJP leader and ex-Deputy Mayor played the main role of a coldblooded killer when he along with his business partner Ashok Mishra decided that their close acquaintance Gopal Mishra was proving to be a thorn in their side.

Gopal Mishra who was in construction business like his associate and friend Ashok Mishra (ex-general secretary of Aliganj traders’ union) wanted to build on a piece of plot in Aliganj area, which also attracted the attention of Ashok Mishra and ex-Deputy Mayor Abhay Seth. Ashok Mishra wanted to build a complex on that plot.

On the day of the incident, Gopal Mishra was visiting a friend’s house with his mother at Chaudhary Tola area of Lucknow, when suddenly a police team arrived at his friend’s residence with a search warrant. Both Ashok Mishra and ex-Deputy Mayor Abhay Seth accompanied the police and took part in the subsequent raid. Then on the instructions of the former Mayor police brutally gunned down Gopal Mishra in front of his mother. The police planted a country-made pistol provided by Ashok Mishra near the dead body and on the next day, claimed they had nabbed and killed a gangster in an encounter.

There was an uproar from the deceased’ family and friends which lead to then-chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh ordering an enquiry into the incident and directing the CB-CID on December 11, 1997, to register an FIR for proper investigation of the case. The charge sheet was presented to the Court and charges were brought against ex-Deputy Mayor Abhay Seth, Ashok Mishra, constables Ram Chander Singh Chandel, Shivbhushan Tiwari and Munshilal, and former station officer of Aliganj, DDS Rathore on October 7, 2008. Constable Munshilal and former station officer, DDS Rathore died during the long process of investigation and trial and so final charges were brought against the other four accused in this case.

Court ruling

The police brought several charges against the perpetrators under Indian Penal Code and Arms Act, ranging from conspiracy, murder, misleading the police and fake encounter. The prosecution presented the testimony of 13 eyewitnesses to the fake encounter case including deceased Gopal Mishra’s mother who was present at the scene of the incident on that fateful day. The case was heard by Honourable Additional Sessions, Judge Swapna Singh. The Court heard the prosecution’s arguments and agreed that the prosecution was successful in proving that the four perpetrators were involved in the conspiracy and fake encounter of Gopal Mishra. The trial court sentenced all the four accused to life imprisonment ending a 24-year-old battle for justice on behalf of Gopal Mishra.

Impact of the judgment

We have often heard the adage – Justice delayed is justice denied which has proven true in the majority of the court cases in India with a huge backlog of cases pending for trial and various prisoners are awaiting their fate for years to come. In this case, it took 24 long years for Gopal Mishra’s family to receive the fruits of justice but after the long struggle, Mishra’s hapless mother can finally rest easy knowing that her son was ultimately vindicated.

This quarter of a century-long battle is a salute to a mother’s strength, courage and perseverance in bringing her son’s ruthless killers to justice. This is also a testimony to the fact that in our country the courts unequivocally and categorically had always championed the cause of justice and had paved the path for many such victims to seek redress of their grievances in the future.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner. This writ is filed by...

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -