Answer Key Publication Promotes Transparency and Allows Corrective Measures by Examining Body: Supreme Court

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

Supreme Court of India ruled that publication of key answer gives an opportunity to candidates to assess the correctness of their response and raise objections if any.

Facts Of The Case

Appellants had appeared in School Lecturer Exam 2015 conducted by Rajasthan Public Service Commission. The written test was conducted pursuant thereto, and key answers were published. Some of the candidates questioned the key answers and even claimed that some questions were wrongly framed. Writ Petition was filed raising the above-mentioned issues. Learned Single Judge gave directions for constituting the Expert Committee to examine as to whether the key to the answer is correct. Expert Committee after examining the answer key deleted 18 questions and corrected answers to some questions. Petitioners filed another writ petitions challenging the report of Expert Committee. Writ Petition was dismissed by learned Division Bench of the High Court. Petitioner preferred an appeal in Supreme Court. The Bench ordered the appointment of Expert Committee to re-examine the grievances of the appellants and submit a status report.

Issues and Arguments Raised

The main Issue before the Bench was regarding the correctness of final key answers as uploaded by the Commission after considering objections thereto. Counsel for appellants submitted that weightage of questions which were deleted were redistributed in the remaining questions instead of allocating it to only those students who attempted deleted questions was bad in law and Expert Committee answered some questions incorrectly. Counsel for respondents submitted that all the grievances were answered by the expert committee and result of non-selected candidates was revised.

Decision Of The Case

Supreme Court of India after listening both the sides said that they agree with the report of Expert Committee and all objections raised by the appellants a with. Supreme Court relied on the precedent of Kanpur University, through its Vice-Chancellor and other v. Samir Gupta and Others and Manish Ujwal and Ors. v.  Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati University and Ors. where facts of the case were similar. Supreme Court in both of these cases ruled that usually when key answers are published it should not be questioned but if there is an error in the key answer then Court can decide on the correctness of the key answers.

In the present case, the Supreme Court agreed with the contention of respondent and ruled that report of the Expert Committee was correct, they had dealt with all the objections raised and there was no error in key answers released by the Expert Committee.

Moreover, the Supreme Court also said that Redistribution of marks with regard to deleted questions weight be the to arbitrary and irrational. The method adopted by the committee was uniform and it benefitted all the candidates.

The Bench further directed the Rajasthan Public Service Commission to revise the result of all those candidates who were not selected , release the cut off marks of last selected candidates in respective categories included in the select list, Offer appointments to all those candidates who cleared the cut-off against the remaining vacancies within 3 months after completion of all the formalities.

Author’s Opinion

This is a welcome decision as this will promote transparency and also make universities hold the examinations the with clockwork precision.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -