Amity Law School Lands In Legal trouble Over Blanket Detention Of Students ‘Short Of Attendance’

Must Read

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years...

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Follow us

Facts

Amity Law School, Delhi, affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi, has once again found itself at the pivot of controversy, this time in students’ challenge to its opaque attendance policy.

One would recall how earlier on August 10 last year, Sushant Rohilla committed suicide for being debarred from appearing in the sixth-semester examinations for want of attendance. A close friend of Rohilla then wrote to the Chief Justice of India alleging arbitrariness in the Amity’s attendance policy. The letter was suo moto taken in the Amity’s attendance policy. The letter was suo moto taken cognizance of as a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. The case was then transferred to the Delhi High Court and is still pending.
It is alleged in the petition that, Amity issued blanket orders to 63 students, of the ninth semester alone, detaining them from appearing in the semester examination allegedly for the shortage of attendance. Similar orders were issued to students of other semesters. In defense, it took a stand that the students and parents were notified in advance of the shortage in attendance and, therefore, they cannot now claim that the procedure was not transparent. Although it appears plausible in first sight, the students had a different narration.

Interestingly, in the previous years, not a single final year student was debarred for lack of attendance. Either way, mass detention for lack of attendance, that, too, of students of a batch about to complete its course, is unprecedented especially since it would result in the loss of a year.

Judgement

The first of the writ petitions in a challenge to the order came to be filed by one Kannan Gopal Vinod of the ninth semester. This was followed by other writ petitions by students of the same as well as other batches. These writ petitions were listed before the bench of Justice Indermeet Kaur of the Delhi High Court. While the first writ was heard by the court pre-lunch and orders were reserved, others were filed, mentioned and listed for orders post-lunch.

In a sigh of relief, the university about 2 pm on Monday issued an Office Order to the effect that ‘all detained students of Amity Law School shall be provisionally allowed to appear in all regular papers of the semester end examinations November / December 2017…’.This was in the wake of numerous complaints received from the students who complained of Amity’s attendance policy as being whimsical and non-transparent. To that extent, the university constituted a committee comprising nine of its top officials to examine such complaints and allegations. As a pre-condition, the University’s Office Order requires the students to furnish an undertaking that their entitlement to appear for the examination is subject to final outcome of the inquiry to be held by the committee.

This received the stamp of approval by the Delhi High Court by way of interim orders permitting the students to appear for the examination scheduled to begin on Tuesday.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -