PMO: PM CARES Fund Not a “Public Authority” Under RTI: Is it a Suspicious Action of the Government?

Must Read

Farm Laws To Be on Hold for 1.5 Yrs, Government Is Scared and Is Looking for Ways To Save Its Skin: BS Brar

The farmers who attended the 10th round of negotiations told that the centre was ready to put the three controversial farm laws into the freeze for the next one and a half years and will be communicating this to the Supreme Court through an affidavit. The farmer unions who sought the repeal of these farm laws said they would consider this proposition and also added that the government was unnerved by their plans of a big tractor rally on Republic Day.

Bhupinder Singh Mann Quits From the Farm Committee Constituted by the Supreme Court

Bhupinder Singh Mann, one of the members nominated to the Farms Law Committee formed by the Supreme Court for negotiating with the farmers, has quit from the panel saying that he cannot compromise the interest of the Punjab and Farmers of the country and for this, he is ready to sacrifice any position.

Maharashtra To Write To Other States To Club Their Reservation Cases With the Maratha Quota Petition

After seeking intervention by the Centre in the ongoing hearing in the present case regarding the Maratha Reservation in the Supreme Court, the Maharashtra Government is pondering upon the idea of approaching other states to club all the petitions regarding reservations for a collective decision.

MoHFW Says Mask Is Not Necessary While Travelling Alone in a Private Vehicle

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) of the Government of India informed the Delhi High Court that it has not issued any guidelines with regards to the compulsion of wearing masks even while travelling alone in a vehicle.

What are the Recent Developments in Iran-Venezuela Relations?

Two of the world's biggest oil exporters are reestablishing bonhomie. Iran and Venezuela are again the topics of discussion in global geopolitics. Iran has recently supplied arms and military soldiers to Venezuela early this year; it had also supplied gasoline to Venezuela.

Targeting the Supreme Court Judges

A letter was written by Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister to the Chief Justice of India on October 6 targeting one...

Follow us

An RTI was filed seeking the details of PM CARES fund. In response the PMO stated PM CARES does not come under the ambit of “Public Authority” under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Introduction 

Considering the ongoing crisis due to the pandemic, the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF) saw invocation. Thus, on March 28th 2020 Modi government announced Prime Minister’s Citizen Help and Relief in Emergency Situation (PM CARES) Fund which accepted donations to fight the pandemic.

As a result of the confusion, an RTI filed to seek details of the fund and creation of PM CARES when PMNRF already existed. The RTI application questioned the following:

1) The total sum collected in the fund to date 

2) Amount collected by the fund in the previous two months

3) The PAN details provided to open the PM CARES Fund.

4) Details of the total sum of money spent on PM CARES Fund until today and;

5) The details of the person known to have deposited the highest amount to the fund. 

Who filed the RTI application?

The Right to Information (RTI) filed by Harsha Kandukuri, a law student from Azim Premji University, Bangalore. Kandukuri, in filing the RTI application sought details of constituting PM CARES when PMNRF already existed. Furthermore, he asked for the fund’s trust deed copies and some government orders related to the creation and functioning of the fund. 

In response to this RTI application, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) stated that under the ambit of Section 2(h) of the RTI, 2005; PM CARES is not a “public authority”. Nonetheless, PMO also stated that relevant information concerning the fund is available on the website pmcares.gov.in. According to a report released by Live Law, no such information was available on the site. 

What is a Public Authority under RTI? 

The scope of “public authority” is under Section 2(h) of Right to Information Act, 2005. A public authority under RTI is an authority or a body or can even be an institution recognized or constituted:

1) By or under the Constitution of India

2) Or by any other law enacted by the parliament.

3) By any law prepared by the state legislature.

4) By issuance of an order or notification made by the appropriate government.

Timeline of Events 

Early 2012

Mr Aseem Takyar files an RTI seeking details of donors and beneficiaries to the PMNRF from 2009 to 2011. The fund denied information and stated it does not come under the domain of public interest and can also cause “unwarranted invasion” to the privacy of donor and beneficiaries.

June 24th 2012

Finally, after making many appeals against the denial of information by the PMNRF, Takyar urged for transparency in the working of PMNRF and approached the Central Information Commission (CIC) for the same. Therefore, in line with the views put forth by Takyar, CIC stated that details of the institutional donors should be public. Yet, it did not support the idea of disclosing the details of public beneficiaries.

Late 2012

Following the decision of the CIC, an appeal made by PMNRF stated where they placed the contention about them being not liable in to disclose the information about the donors and the beneficiary as PMNRF doesn’t come under the domain of “public authority”.

May 21st 2018

The judgment delivered on the matter pointed out that both the judges had different opinions on the issue. Justice Ravindra Bhat stated that PMNRF comes under the ambit of “public authority” and the same should be subject to public scrutiny. But, Justice Sunil Gaur gave a dissenting opinion by stating PMNRF does not fall under the domain of “public authority” and thus, it cannot share any kind of information. 

September 12th 2018

After the dissenting opinion in the judgment, Chief Justice of Delhi High Court asked to refer the matter to a third judge, and the same is on the list for hearing on July 15th 2020.

Questions raised by Significant Personalities on PM-CARES 

  • Sonia Gandhi- In her letter to the Prime Minister, stated that all the funds raised by way of PM CARES should immediately be transferred to PMNRF to safeguard competency, responsibility, transparency, efficiency and audit in the manner these funds were allotted and the way they are being spent. 
  • Aseem Takyar- Activist Aseem Takyar stated he would file an RTI to seek information about PM CARES so that transparency and accountability can be ensured.
  • HuffPost India- HuffPost India, an online legal portal, questioned the Modi government if at all it is planning to disclose the details of the donors and the beneficiaries of PM CARES. If the government anticipates a response  to this query, the portal needs to have all the required information.

Author’s Note: Suspicions of the likelihood of a Scam 

In the recent events where the status of “public authority” has been denied to PM CARES, there can be a reasonable inference drawn to the fact that it is not controlled by the government of India. Consequently, the critical question which arises here is- then who is controlling it? 

Furthermore, the public is unaware of many important aspects like the functioning of the trust, decision-making process in addition to the faith, measures taken to safeguard the fund and to give assurance that the fund is not misused so far. The public doesn’t know the answer to any of these questions. Hence, this acts as a big blow to transparency in working and upholding democratic values. 

Thus, dragging the attention of the public to the ongoing controversy shows that there exists a dire need to address such matters. Merely stating the fact that PM CARES does not fall under “Public Authority” is not a solution to the problem. Furthermore, many events, like the name, configuration of the trust, domain name of the government, suggest that the fund be a public authority. But the government continues to deny this fact and therefore, continues to build a wall of secrecy around the working of PM CARES.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

Supreme Court Upheld “Environmental Rule of Law” in NGT Decision to Demolish Illegal Hotel on Forest Land

This case concerns the dispute relating to the additional construction of hotel-cum-restaurant structure in the Bus Stand Complex along with a bus stand and...

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner. This writ is filed by...

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -