Tamil Nadu Political Turmoil

Must Read

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

“Pro-Enforcement Bias” Towards Foreign Arbitral Awards Domestically, in light of Vijay Karia and Ors. V. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L and Ors.

International Arbitration faces challenges domestically due to unharmonized local laws for enforcement. Often it may occur that an award...

Follow us

The state of Tamil Nadu was thrown in a state of turmoil post the death of the incumbent chief minister Jayalalithaa. With the top post up for grabs seemingly every AIADMK big shot were in the fray to be the Chief Minister. O Panneerselvam and Sasikala emerged as the front runners for the post once the initial dust had settled. O Panneerselvam, had taken over the reign, as caretaker chief minister from the time Jayalalithaa was hospitalized till after her death, only to resign soon after. And soon after his resignation he alleged that he had been forced to resign by the then General Secretary Sasikala. In reaction to this Sasikala convened a party meeting at her residence at Poes Garden and therein removed Panneerselvam from his then post of treasurer. With Panneerselvam seemingly out of the contention for the top post, the swearing in ceremony of Sasikala as Tamil Nadu’s next Chief Minister almost remained a question of when, and the answer to that was 7th of February.

However, a contingency to this was the fact that there was a long, 21 years old, pending judgment on alleged disproportionate assets, involving Sasikala. The Governor in charge, C Vidyasagar Rao, who had reportedly taken legal advice on the matter thought it better to postpone the swearing-in till after the judgment of the Supreme Court was passed. The Supreme Court in its judgment on the disproportionate assets case held VK Sasikala as guilty and in effect did away with any chance of her becoming the Chief Minister of the state. The judgment found Sasikala and two others guilty and barred Sasikala from holding a public office and contesting in the elections for the next ten years, her jail term plus the next six years.

Thus, with the judgment, O Panneerselvam was back in the fray to grabbing the top spot. However, Sasikala before surrendering ensured that a member loyal to her, E K Palanisamy was elected as the party leader and subsequently as the Chief Minister of the state. The legal scenario at this juncture was of particular importance, Palanisamy, even after being elected as the leader of the party, was still up against Panneerselvam for the chief ministerial post. Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi on this situation stated that if the Governor, C Vidyasagar Rao, believes that there are rival claims form within the same party then a floor test should be conducted, what a floor test means is that all the legislators, 234 MLAS, of the state would have to vote for a candidate, either Panneerselvam or Palanisamy.

On February 18thteam Palanisamy won the floor test by a comfortable 122-11 margin after intense bedlam and drama. Prior to the floor test taking place 98 out of the 234 legislators, principal opposition DMK, were evicted and their allies walked out.After Palanisamy won the trust vote in the Tamil Nadu Assembly, the opposition DMK petitioned the Madras High Court to cancel the vote. In case the trust vote had been cancelled, the focus would have shifted to the behaviour of the governor of Tamil Nadu vis-à-vis asking for a new trust vote and government continuation or formation.

Amidst all these political mayhem, we cannot overlook the role played by the Governor, Vidyasagar Rao, during this phase. With a guilty verdict against Sasikala in the disproportionate assets case, the governor’s stand in not inviting Sasikala to form the government or prove her majority has been considered, by various people,  as evidence of his farsightedness. However, the fact that the Governor essentially chose to suspend democracy in Tamil Nadu for quite a few days and continue with an unrepresentative and hence undemocratic regime instead, cannot be ignored.

There are more than enough reasons to belief that the Governor, a veteran of BJP-Jansangh for more the four decades, gave sufficient opportunity to anti-AIADMK forces in Tamil Nadu to try to dissolve the party. The party, which has probed the most in these troubled waters, is the BJP, whose support for the Panneerselvam group was quite open. It also has to be noted that Panneerselvam, in his brief regime, bartered away Tamil Nadu’s state rights when it agreed to the UDAY scheme which Jayalalithaa had strongly opposed to, on grounds of encroachment on federal structure. Though the Centre had found a docile collaborator in Panneerselvam, it could not make its place in Chennai as the majority went with the loyal AIADMK member, Palanisamy. With E. Palanisamy in charge of the state of affairs in Tamil Nadu, the political turmoil seems to have subsided, although temporarily just like stillness before a storm.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

Supreme Court Agrees To Examine Centre’s Plea To Keep Adultery a Crime in Armed Forces

The Centre appealed to the Supreme court on Wednesday, pleading that the 2018 judgment of decriminalizing adultery under IPC must not apply to the armed forces. The Supreme Court in a path-breaking verdict in 2018 decriminalized adultery and declared all its provisions unconstitutional as it diminishes the value of women, but maintained that it continues to be a ground for divorce.

Supreme Court Examines the Pollution in Yamuna River for the Second Time

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made a second attempt to clean the Yamuna river by taking a Suo Moto Cognizance of significantly high levels of ammonia water discharged from neighbouring states like Haryana into Delhi.

Fetus Suffering From Anencephaly, Woman’s Plea To Terminate 28-Weeks Pregnancy Allowed by Delhi HC

Based on the report of the medical board constituted by AIIMS, the Delhi High Court on Monday allowed a petition filed by a woman seeking the termination of her 28-weeks pregnancy. They said in its report that the fetus suffered from anencephaly, a disorder where the skull bone is not developed and was thus incompatible with life, therefore her fetus can be aborted.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -