Snapchat Fiasco: When Patriotism Sees No Reason

Must Read

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Follow us

snapchatIndia is responsible for a roundabout 200m Facebook users and a fair about 4m Snapchat users which can by no means be construed to be taken as an insignificant number. Having been said that, Evan Spiegel, the CEO of Snapchat feels that India is too poor a country to even think about expanding his business into. Obviously, such a statement would not go unattended or unwelcomed by the Indian set of onlookers. There is a lot more and deep to this snapchat story than what we have been reading about in the headlines. Or should rather say, depending upon how you look onto it.

Hailing over the controversy that a few days back glimmered on the internet marking Evan Spiegel’s trite comment that of calling India a “poor country”, a lot many people, ran enthusiastically high on patriotic fervor and subsequently decided to show their resentment by igniting rants and by storming the internet with hashtags on twitter such as #UninstallSnapchat and #BoycottSnapchat. This social networking anger and the wrath everywhere throughout the week sprang from the remarks Spiegel is alleged to have made.  As reported by Variety, an ex-representative Anthony Pompliano amid a private meeting in the year 2015 brought to the notice of Evan, snapchat’s dull performance and execution in Spain and India by asserting that the application was not getting the desired results and is not taking off well overseas. He further recommended how Snapchat ought to consider the deep-rooted mobile and internet based web of people in India so as to catalyze growth. The suggestion seemed unappealing to the then 25 years old lad and so he was cut halfway by the CEO.

The allegedly tagged elitist statement by Evan saw the light of the day when Pompliano’s claim against the gross neglect and incorrect portrayal of numbers by the company was put on show to the public by the way of releasing a copy of the suit online.


The truth be said. We Indians love to express our outrage against anything that disturbs our façade of patriotism by resorting to a numerous of very influencing activities like bringing down the ratings of an application on Google Play Store and by uninstalling the applications. It is to be noted that this isn’t the first instance when the country has witnessed such a slacktivism. History is in itself able to testify that Snapdeal earlier had to bear the heft of a similar fury. Flipkart is another brand that was forced to bear such a shock, to the point that brought about a drop in its rating to a 1 star after it was viewed as going opposed to the idea of net neutrality for which Airtel was at that point already suffering.

Affected by the ongoing deluge of resentment, the parent company Snap Inc. stepped out and tagged Pompliano as a “disgruntled employee fired for poor performance who filed the lawsuit out of thirst for publicity.” While they came to the rescue and out rightly denied any such remark by Spiegel, the reactions did not cease. A storm of Facebook and Twitter posts and 1 star ratings on Play Store and Apple’s App Store highlight numerous people voicing out their resentment.


The most crucial tangent that is still ignored by many is that there is no direct statement made by Evans. He never made the alleged statement that India is a poor nation [Sources: Topyaps, NASDAQ, IndianExpress, BeingIndian, Hindustan Times, YourStory, Dailymail UK]. All of this is a boiled-up stock of the broth that started to cook in a document of suit filed by a displeased employee. This most recent shock could be really unfair to the company and have serious setbacks.


I am likewise unable to figure out why we Indians feel so outraged about a mobile application that doesn’t consider India as a good or profitable market? How can in any stretch of imagination a CEO’s asserted remark/statement shake the pillars of our pride? I haven’t seen Spanish individuals flooding the online networking (Facebook or Twitter) with bolsters about highlighting their dissatisfaction in this regard. Is it accurate to say that they are offending and uninstalling Snapchat?


As a result of such acts of the people from time to time, I am sorry to say but tragically India is gaining a notorious kind of a reputation on the web. The reputation thus gained is that Indians are easily provoked or triggered. Say some cockeyed words in regards to India on the internet and Indians will get activated. This has gone up to the extent that they are so blindfolded by their rage that other applications with similar phonetics get hammered. Snapdeal, unfortunately, was mistaken for Snapchat and fell prey to the ongoing ire.


So ludicrous are the Indians over this infamous statement made by the CEO, that they are subjecting Snapdeal to the fate of uninstallations and poor ratings on the Play store as well as the app store. I am sure the word “Snap” is causing a great distress to Snapdeal. Is this some sort of a deliberate numbness on the part of the people or is it that they are unable to chalk out the distinction between the two? Dreading over a comment that a CEO perhaps made in a private meeting while discussing about his business plans and strategy, demonstrates that there is some kind of a serious issue with the people of the country.

I think that it’s difficult for me as a citizen of this nation to gulp that India as a country has such low self-regard that we are so easily provoked by a comment, and then go set up to brawl. I am certain that history would repeat itself and like previous instances, the present blow against Snapchat will have no dependable effect and will be temporary. Everybody nowadays is too effortlessly affronted and provoked and the Snapchat debacle demonstrates that this certainly is true.


  1. So true, but sadly, people in India don’t analyse before they pass their judgments and the unnecessary reactions start coming in abundance.
    Well said.

  2. Thank you so much for the appreciation. Nevertheless, I believe that our deep sense of insecurity as a nation is also linked to our definition of what is’s defined in the general clauses act as what territory lies within boundaries and that’s mention of a ‘shared’ culture et al as advocated by the right wing brigade.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -