Obiter & Ratio’s National Legal Opinion Writing Competition on Constitutional Law: Prizes Worth 5K, Register by Aug 23

Must Read

Call for Blogs by The Quest Socio-Legal Review: Rolling Submissions

Quest Socio-Legal Review is inviting submissions for its blog on socio-legal issues, contemporary legal issues as well as on...

Call for Papers: International Journal for Research in Law [ISSN: 2454-8715]: Submit by Feb 15,2021

International Journal for Research in Law (ISSN: 2454-8715) (A Peer-Reviewed, Quarterly Publication) invites Articles, Short Notes, Book Reviews Case...

Brillopedia [ISBN: 978-1636332703] Volume 1, Issue 1 + 1st Research paper writing competition, submit by Feb 27,2021

ABOUT THE JOURNAL Brillopedia can provide interesting articles about law, socio-legal and contemporary issues. We are also providing a platform...

Call for Papers on Farm Bill by Literary & Debating Society, SOL, Sharda University: Submit by 20th Jan,2021

The Literary & Debating society of the School of Law, Sharda University is calling for research papers relevant to...

Call for Papers: Jurisperitus: The Law Journal [ISSN 2581-6349, Indexed, Volume 3, Issue 2]: Submit by 30th Jan,2021

About the Jurisperitus Jurisperitus: The Law Journal (ISSN 2581-6349, Indexed) is a non-annual peer-reviewed journal initiated with an aim to provide...

4th Article writing competition by Brillopedia: [ISBN: 978-1637451953]: Submit by 31st Jan,2021

4th Article writing competition by Brillopedia:   About the blog: Brillopedia can provide interesting articles about law, socio-legal and contemporary issues....

Follow us

About the Obiter & Ratio

Obiter & Ratio is a legal portal which aims to provide pertinent legal updates on the changing dimensions of law. Our primary focus lies on the judgments and orders rendered by the High Courts and specialised Tribunals in India which elucidates a new position of law.

About the Competition

The Research Room is an effort to facilitate law students to build on their skill of ‘Legal Research and Writing’. Obiter & Ratio believes that writing a detailed legal opinion is one of the prime requisites for being a successful lawyer.

Hence, it is our aim to create a systematic process for law students to help them develop the skill of understanding legal texts and interpreting them to submit the best legal argument.

The students would be expected to undertake a legal analysis of all the issues by placing only legal arguments. The competition would demand clarity of thought and in-depth research on the legal issues raised.

A Sample Format for the same can be found here.

Thus, in furtherance of the aforesaid, research questions on the theme of Constitutional Law have been drafted by our panel of experts who are as follows:

  • Sankalp Kochar, Advocate, Madhya Pradesh High Court.
  • Ajar Rab, Partner, Rab & Rab Associates LLP.
  • Aman Rab, Partner, Rab & Rab Associates LLP.
  • Krishna Deo Singh Chauhan, Assistant Professor of Law, JGLS.
  • Pushkar Anand, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi.

Important Dates

  1. Last Date of Registration: August 23, 2020
  2. Last Date to seek Clarifications: August 30, 2020
  3. Last date of Submission: September 6, 2020
  4. Declaration of Results: September 13, 2020

Note: Results shall be declared on Obiter and Ratio’s Instagram and Linkedin handles.


  • Students currently pursuing their Bachelor’s Degree in law i.e. 3-Year LL.B. course or 5-Year LL.B. course from any recognized university/school in India.
  • There is no restriction on the number of entries per college or university.
  • Fresh Graduates of the year 2020 (including LLM) are also allowed.

Team Composition

The team composition can be as follow:

  • Single Member.
  • Two-Member.

Note: Cross-Teams are also allowed.

Registration Details

Please register your team by filling up the Google Form here.

Registration Fees

  1. Single Participant: Rs 300/-
  2. Team Participation (2 members): Rs. 400/-

Payment Details


Research Questions for the Competition

The students shall be required to answer the following research questions:
  1. Can issuing of a show-cause notice by a Speaker to a Member of Legislative Assembly be regarded as the making of a “decision” and hence, amenable to challenge before a Court of law? If yes, can a Court of law interfere in a question pertaining to disqualification under the Tenth Schedule prior to the Speaker exercising his jurisdiction regarding the same?
  2. Can “intra-party dispute and dissent” be regarded as amenable to anti-defection law under Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India?
  3.  Is the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India violative of the basic structure of the Constitution?


The participants securing the First and Second shall be felicitated with the following awards:

  • First Position: Rs. 3,000/-, the publication of the Legal Opinion in Obiter Ratio, the opportunity to intern with Obiter & Ratio for 1 month as an Associate Editor.
  • Second Position: Rs. 2,000/-, the publication of the Legal Opinion in Obiter & Ratio, opportunity to intern with Obiter & Ratio for 1 month as an Associate Editor.
  • Top 10 entries shall be awarded Certificate of Merit.
  • Certificate of Participation will be provided to all participants.
  • E-Certificates will be provided to all participants on their respective Emails.

Contact Information

E-mail ID: [email protected]

Mobile Numbers: +917986078874 (Whatsapp)


For full details of the competition, click here. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. Libertatem Group does not take any responsibility for the accuracy of this Event Notification. The post has been shared as we received it from the event organizers/host.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -