Obiter & Ratio’s National Legal Opinion Writing Competition on Constitutional Law: Prizes Worth 5K, Register by Aug 23

Must Read

2nd Wildlife Protection Government Law College National Online Moot Court Competition, 2020

Government Law College, Mumbai, in association with the Wildlife Conservation Trust and the Initiative for Climate Action, presents the 2nd Wildlife...

1st RNBGU All India Online 2-Days Debate Competition [Oct 30-31]: Register by Oct 25

About the University RNB Global University, Bikaner is established vide Act No. 20 of 2015 in the State of Rajasthan....

CCS’ eColloquium on The Limits of Democracy [November 22]: Apply by October 25

About CCS Centre for Civil Society (CCS) has been ranked amongst the top 60 think tanks in the world (and...

Call for Blogs on Alternative Dispute Resolution [ADR] by UPES’ School of Law, Dehradun: Submit by Nov 5

About the ADR Association of UPES The ADR Association at the School of Law, UPES, Dehradun is a premier academic...

Call for Papers: International Journal of Research and Analysis [Vol 6 Issue 1]: Publication Fee Rs. 1400; Submit by Nov 30

The International Journal of Research and Analysis is delighted to announce a call for papers for its Volume 6...

Call for Blogs | The Human Rights Blog

ABOUT THE CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES IN HUMAN RIGHTS   The Centre for Advanced Studies in Human Rights (‘CASIHR’) is a...

Follow us

About the Obiter & Ratio

Obiter & Ratio is a legal portal which aims to provide pertinent legal updates on the changing dimensions of law. Our primary focus lies on the judgments and orders rendered by the High Courts and specialised Tribunals in India which elucidates a new position of law.

About the Competition

The Research Room is an effort to facilitate law students to build on their skill of ‘Legal Research and Writing’. Obiter & Ratio believes that writing a detailed legal opinion is one of the prime requisites for being a successful lawyer.

Hence, it is our aim to create a systematic process for law students to help them develop the skill of understanding legal texts and interpreting them to submit the best legal argument.

The students would be expected to undertake a legal analysis of all the issues by placing only legal arguments. The competition would demand clarity of thought and in-depth research on the legal issues raised.

A Sample Format for the same can be found here.

Thus, in furtherance of the aforesaid, research questions on the theme of Constitutional Law have been drafted by our panel of experts who are as follows:

  • Sankalp Kochar, Advocate, Madhya Pradesh High Court.
  • Ajar Rab, Partner, Rab & Rab Associates LLP.
  • Aman Rab, Partner, Rab & Rab Associates LLP.
  • Krishna Deo Singh Chauhan, Assistant Professor of Law, JGLS.
  • Pushkar Anand, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi.

Important Dates

  1. Last Date of Registration: August 23, 2020
  2. Last Date to seek Clarifications: August 30, 2020
  3. Last date of Submission: September 6, 2020
  4. Declaration of Results: September 13, 2020

Note: Results shall be declared on Obiter and Ratio’s Instagram and Linkedin handles.


  • Students currently pursuing their Bachelor’s Degree in law i.e. 3-Year LL.B. course or 5-Year LL.B. course from any recognized university/school in India.
  • There is no restriction on the number of entries per college or university.
  • Fresh Graduates of the year 2020 (including LLM) are also allowed.

Team Composition

The team composition can be as follow:

  • Single Member.
  • Two-Member.

Note: Cross-Teams are also allowed.

Registration Details

Please register your team by filling up the Google Form here.

Registration Fees

  1. Single Participant: Rs 300/-
  2. Team Participation (2 members): Rs. 400/-

Payment Details


Research Questions for the Competition

The students shall be required to answer the following research questions:
  1. Can issuing of a show-cause notice by a Speaker to a Member of Legislative Assembly be regarded as the making of a “decision” and hence, amenable to challenge before a Court of law? If yes, can a Court of law interfere in a question pertaining to disqualification under the Tenth Schedule prior to the Speaker exercising his jurisdiction regarding the same?
  2. Can “intra-party dispute and dissent” be regarded as amenable to anti-defection law under Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India?
  3.  Is the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India violative of the basic structure of the Constitution?


The participants securing the First and Second shall be felicitated with the following awards:

  • First Position: Rs. 3,000/-, the publication of the Legal Opinion in Obiter Ratio, the opportunity to intern with Obiter & Ratio for 1 month as an Associate Editor.
  • Second Position: Rs. 2,000/-, the publication of the Legal Opinion in Obiter & Ratio, opportunity to intern with Obiter & Ratio for 1 month as an Associate Editor.
  • Top 10 entries shall be awarded Certificate of Merit.
  • Certificate of Participation will be provided to all participants.
  • E-Certificates will be provided to all participants on their respective Emails.

Contact Information

E-mail ID: [email protected]

Mobile Numbers: +917986078874 (Whatsapp)


For full details of the competition, click here. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. Libertatem Group does not take any responsibility for the accuracy of this Event Notification. The post has been shared as we received it from the event organizers/host.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -