Nishkarsh Rashtriya Yuva Samagam presents “Conflict Confronts”, A National E-Debate Competition on 21st, 22nd and 23rd August, 2020.

Must Read

Call for Blogs by The Quest Socio-Legal Review: Rolling Submissions

Quest Socio-Legal Review is inviting submissions for its blog on socio-legal issues, contemporary legal issues as well as on...

Call for Papers: International Journal for Research in Law [ISSN: 2454-8715]: Submit by Feb 15,2021

International Journal for Research in Law (ISSN: 2454-8715) (A Peer-Reviewed, Quarterly Publication) invites Articles, Short Notes, Book Reviews Case...

Brillopedia [ISBN: 978-1636332703] Volume 1, Issue 1 + 1st Research paper writing competition, submit by Feb 27,2021

ABOUT THE JOURNAL Brillopedia can provide interesting articles about law, socio-legal and contemporary issues. We are also providing a platform...

Call for Papers on Farm Bill by Literary & Debating Society, SOL, Sharda University: Submit by 20th Jan,2021

The Literary & Debating society of the School of Law, Sharda University is calling for research papers relevant to...

Call for Papers: Jurisperitus: The Law Journal [ISSN 2581-6349, Indexed, Volume 3, Issue 2]: Submit by 30th Jan,2021

About the Jurisperitus Jurisperitus: The Law Journal (ISSN 2581-6349, Indexed) is a non-annual peer-reviewed journal initiated with an aim to provide...

4th Article writing competition by Brillopedia: [ISBN: 978-1637451953]: Submit by 31st Jan,2021

4th Article writing competition by Brillopedia:   About the blog: Brillopedia can provide interesting articles about law, socio-legal and contemporary issues....

Follow us

About Organization

Nishkarsh Rashtriya Yuva Samagam is a budding organization which has hosted its First National Level Quiz Competition on Constitutional Law on the 10th of June 2020 and has received an overwhelming response of over 400+ participants in the same and is also involved in other Competitions. Recently on 15th July Nishkarsh Rashtriya Yuva Samagam has hosted it’s first edition of E-Mun. We are going to organize National Debate Competition on 22nd and 23rd August, 2020. Our main objective is to provide platform to as many people as possible so that they can showcase their talent.

About the Competition

“If you have to say or do something controversial, aim so that people will hate that they love it and not love that they hate it.”

Last date for registration- 18/08/2020

Who can register- Any one who is interested in Debate can participate.

How to Participate- (Register your self)

Rules of Procedure-

There will be four rounds:-

  1. The Reasons and Arguments
  2. The voice of the brains ( Extempore)
  3. Knock Out Round ( Cross Examination )
  4. Tug of  Word’s war

Reasons & Arguments

We are providing 10 topics from which the participant has to select any one topic and have to give speech  in for or against on it.

Topics for First Round-

  1. Are reservation in job & education justified?
  2. Faminism and the power of law
  3. Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 is “just and not divisive”
  4. Birth control should be for sale over the counter.
  5. How is peer pressure different from bullying?
  6. Sex education necessary for middle school students?
  7. Should police have the right to shoot to kill?
  8. Capital Punishment: A Bane or Boon
  9. Is freedom of speech a necessity in a functional society?
  10. Climate change is the greatest threat in human history.

1.1 The participants will itself decide whether they choose ‘For or Against’

1.2 Time allotted for round is 3+2min, first 3 min  for speech and 2 min for question and answer round by the Judges.

2.The Voice of Brains (Extempore)

Topic would be provided on the spot and the participants would be given 1 minute for deciding whether they opt to speak “For” or “Against”.

2.1 Time limit would be 2 minutes for speech and 30 sec for conclusion.

2.2 There will be no question and answer round.

3.Knock Out Round ( Cross Examination )

For this round you will get topic One night before round.

3.1 For this round who will face whom will be decided by the  organising committee.

3.2 Who will speak in for or against the topic will be decided by Draw of lots.

3.3 Time limit for this round will be 3 + 2+ 2mins

First 3 minutes will be provided for speech and 2 minutes for rebuttal and rest 2 minutes for judges question and answer round(cross examination).

4.Tug of words war

For the final round four participants will  be qualified and 4.1The topic would be provided 1 hour before the final round.

4.2 Who will speak in for or against the topic will be decided by Draw of lots.

4.1 The time limit will be 5 + 3 minutes i.e, 5 minutes for speech and 3 minutes for Rebuttal.

When all the four participants will complete their rebuttal then the Judges and viewers can ask the questions from the participants. One viewer can ask only one question from any finalist.

Language- Bilingual (Hindi/English)


Judging Criteria-

1.Time Management

2.Communication Skill/ Voice 3.Projection/ Inflection

4.Presence of mind


6.Clarity of thoughts

7.Approach /Appearance

8.Expressions/ Eye Contact /



11.Worthwhile Message

Note- Changes can be made in the Rules of Procedure with the mutual consent of the Organizing Committee. The decision of the in Organizing Committee will be valid.

Registration Fee- 50rs only

How to register – Click on the link given below to register yourself


Payment Details-

Paytm/Google Pay- 7050334644

For any queries feel free to contact- +91 9044882334

Email id- [email protected]

Instagram- here

Facebook- Here is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. Libertatem Group does not take any responsibility for the accuracy of this Event Notification. The post has been shared as we received it from the event organizers/host.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner. This writ is filed by...

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -