Case – Jaswant Singh v Union of India Facts The plaintiff was enrolled as a Sepoy on January 1, 2003 in the Indian army. A
Case – Maharashtra State Public Prosecutors Association v. State of Maharashtra Citation: WP NO. 8117/2017 Reserved On: 10th July 2018-12-18 Pronounced On: 24th August 2018
Case: Sukhlal v State of Madhya Pradesh Judge: Justice AK Sikri, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S Abdul Nazeer “Life imprisonment is the rule and
The Supreme Court judgment on Friday, 14 December 2018 regarding investigating allegations of government wrongdoing in the Rafale deal has been received with mix reviews.
In Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Pratibha Industries Ltd, a question was put up on the High Court’s power to recall its orders. The
The United Kingdom Court decided on extradition of fugitive liquor baron Vijay Mallya and ordered him to be extradited to India. Liquor Baron is currently
Supreme Court of India once again warned High Courts about the menace of misuse of Public Interest Litigation. There have been instances in past where
Delhi High Court has ruled that private companies which fall under the purview of government regulators cannot shirk their responsibilities under RTI Act, 2005. The government
Supreme Court of India ruled that High Courts of India are empowered to consider a petition seeking quashing of FIR even after filling of charge-sheet
Facts In a double murder case the accused (kalla) of the case was sent for life imprisonment by the trial court, the High Court however
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
