This case concerns the question of the genuineness of the photocopies of the documents, which were as old as 30 years presented to ensure the title of the suit property. The Court said that they can be presumed to be genuine if they are produced from proper custody.
The Court, while considering the well-settled position of law through various precedents observed that alternate remedy available ought to be exhausted under the SARFAESI Act before approaching the Court under Article 226.
Supreme Court bench headed by CJI SA Bobde and comprising of Justice AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, without taking much time, said, “as an apex court, we find it disturbing”.
Fourteen NEET aspirants were allowed by the Delhi High Court to physically inspect their OMR sheets at the office of the National Testing Agency (NTA). This was pursuant to a Petition apprehending tampering with answer sheets.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court held that the High Court has inherent power to quash criminal proceedings even in those cases which are not compoundable, but such power is to be exercised sparingly and with great caution.
The Court held that even post admission of winding up petition, and after the appointment of a company liquidator to take over the assets of a company sought to be wound up, it is the discretion of the Company Court to transfer such petition to the NCLT.
The Delhi High Court issued the summons in a suit by the owner of Amul trademark, GCMMF. The video used Amul’s trademark while showing torture and cruelty to cows.
Punjab & Haryana HC Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer of Candidates From Reserved to General Category.
The Court held here that ‘Acceptance’ under the Transfer of Property Act is to be determined according to the Conduct of the Parties.
The Bombay HC held that the Procedure for Claiming Juvenility Can Be Invoked at Any Stage Even After Final Disposal of Case.
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
