The Court ordered the formation of a three-member Pandemic Public Grievance Committee in every district of Uttar Pradesh.
Protection Under Article 311 Can Be Claimed Only by the Persons Who Hold a Civil Post Under the Union or a State: Delhi High...
The Appellant filed the present Intra Court appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent Act impugning the judgment passed by the Ld. Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by him. The Court, however, found no merit in...
UPPTCL Has No Power to Realize Labour Cess Under Cess Act by Invoking a Performance Guarantee: Supreme Court
The Petitioner, UPPTCL, filed the present Special Leave Petition, under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, against a final Judgment and Orderpassed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench). The Court, however, said that the...
Apprehension of Death on Account of Ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic Is a Valid Ground for Grant of Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court
The present anticipatory bail application was filed by the petitioner in Case Crime No. 1906 of 2020 under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 406 IPC. The Bail application was allowed by the Court on account of apprehension of his death due to the ongoing pandemic.
Death of Covid-19 Patients Just Because of Non-Supplying of Oxygen to Hospitals Is Criminal Act and Not Less Than Genocide: Allahabad High Court
In the present PIL, the question was put on the preparedness of the Government to deal with the current surge of the pandemic in the face of the lacking public health infrastructure to meet the requirement. The Court, after considering the whole matter, directed the authorities to take remedial measures as soon as possible.
Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Act, 2016, and Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Rules, 2017 Not Violative of Article 19(1)(G): Supreme Court
In the present case, two sets of appeals were filed before the Supreme Court of India challenging the decisions of the Rajasthan High Court regarding the matter of fee during the current pandemic time. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, however, upheld the decision of the High Court and rejected the current petition being devoid of merit
Delhi High Court Allows Review Petition Saying That Relief Cannot Be Granted to Those Who Haven’t Petitioned Before Court
In the present case, the respondents/review petitioners filed a review petition for the impugned judgement dated 10th April 2019, which directed for the payment of RMA to all the personnel of CRPF up to the rank of Commandant. The Court allowed the review petition saying that relief cannot be granted to those who didn’t petition before the Court.
The Rights Under the Domestic Violence Act and the Senior Citizens Act Have To Be Balanced: Delhi High Court
Excerpt The appellants filed the present Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) under Clause 10 of the letters patent and sought for setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated passed by the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court. The...
Jammu and Kashmir High Court Direct Reconsideration of the Land Dispute Matter on Account of the Neglect of the Fundamental Issue
In the present case, the Petitioner filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of partition and possession. In addition, an application for interim relief against the Respondents was filed in respect to land that was claimed to be...
Only Terms & Conditions of the Document Relevant For Determining Nature of Document Not Use of Words: Rajasthan High Court
The present petition under Section 96 CPC was directed against the judgment and decree passed by District Judge Pali, whereby, the suit filed by the respondent -plaintiff was decreed for possession and mesne profit. The same was, however, dismissed by the Court.