A Public Interest Litigation seeking the inclusion of Judges, Judicial staff, advocates and the members of the legal fraternity in the first phase of COVID-19 vaccination has been filed in the Delhi High Court.
Hansa Research the complainant, who had filed a writ in the Mumbai High Court complaining of Police harassment in early November 2020 in the TRP scam case, has now filed a rejoinder in the Court to the reply filed by Mumbai Police. Hansa has stated that the reply by the Mumbai Police “contains nothing but few denials and unsubstantiated, vague and superficial allegations”.
5 years of education, sleepless nights, years of hard work, finally one gets a case. Hours of research goes into preparation for each case. After all this, the lawyers who argued are not paid. even when they argue on behalf of the government.
The Delhi High Court clarified that intervention of elders and friends in the society cannot be grounds for quashing an FIR filed under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 and Section 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO).
The Bombay High Court’s Aurangabad Bench has given directions to the electronic media, print media, social media users such as Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook, etc, to be cautious before circulating information regarding rape cases so that the victim is not identified directly or indirectly.
Excerpt: A Single-Judge Bench consisting of Honorable Justice R. Raghunandan Rao gave orders on the writ petition no. 1812 of 2021 in Mandakurthi Jayaram vs
The Appellant was convicted for attempting illicit transportation of sandalwood, a prohibited item for export. He has filed an appeal under Section 130 of the
Tezoram filed an appeal under Clause 15 to set aside the order dated 08.10.2020. He was issued a pre-assessment notice. However, he failed or chose
In M/S. Ambience vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, on 25 January 2021, the impugned order was passed by Deputy Commercial Tax Officer without considering the C-Forms submitted by the petitioner. The Telangana High Court remitted back the matter to the 1st respondent for fresh consideration and permitted the petitioner to file the C-Forms.
Introduction An appeal was made by the petitioner against a judgment passed against him penalizing him with rigorous imprisonment of a lifetime and a fine
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
