SwapnaRamaswamy

The rapid increase of COVID-19 cases has led to the suspension of activities. The Court issued a notification on 18 July 2020. The notification is about the suspension of activities from the 20 July 2020 to 22 July 2020. In addition, they will remain suspended on 24 July 2020. Moreover,

Supreme Court Collegium approved the appointment of Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay as a permanent judge. The Court passed the resolution-making him a permanent judge on 14 July 2020. Previously, Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay was appointed to the Court as an Additional Judge on 2 May 2018. Subsequently, in April 2019, the Court extended

The rapid increase of COVID-19 cases has led to the suspension of activities. The Court issued a notification No 1928- on 9th of July 2020. The notification is in relation to the suspension of activities from the 10th of July 2020 to 13th of July 2020. There are new contaminated

Notification No. 1928 The Calcutta High Court issued a notification on 9th of July 2020. The notification is about the suspension of judicial and administrative activities from the 10th of July 2020 to 13th of July 2020. The Court has issued the reasoning to be the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, several

The present case is an appeal of the Arbitral award given by the tribunal. The Calcutta High Court states that the arbitrator is the final authority. Award appealed under section 34 is only applicable if material evidence were not considered. Facts of the Case  The petitioner filed a claim before

The petitioner, a civilian, filed a plea before the Calcutta High Court requesting an arms license. He filed the writ petition under Sections 13 and 14 of the Arms Act, 1959. Facts of the Case The petitioner sought the help of the Court and requests the grant an arms license.

Due to the lockdown, reports of an increase in child marriage surfaced. The Calcutta High Court has suspected the following to be a garb for child trafficking. Secretary for Women and Child Development Department also filed a report on the matter. The investigations, therein, helped to rescue the children. Court’s

COVID-19 has brought a dire situation where there is a non-availability of access to the Courts. The present order is about the cases pending with interim orders. These matters are pending in the High Courts and Subordinate Courts. On 24th March 2020, the Court issued an order relating to the

Calcutta High Court took an aggressive stand to impose a fine of ₹50,000 on an advocate-on-record. It imposed the fine for misuse of the Bail application system. Facts of the Case On the 22nd June 2020, the Calcutta High Court imposed strict costs on an advocate-on-record. The order stated that

Prakash Industries Ltd. filed a petition before the High Court of Calcutta. They filed it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The main issue that arose is whether or not the amendment of an arbitration petition can be considered after the award is issued. Facts of