Calcutta High Court Decides on Whether an Appeal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act Allows Amending of Petitions

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

Prakash Industries Ltd. filed a petition before the High Court of Calcutta. They filed it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The main issue that arose is whether or not the amendment of an arbitration petition can be considered after the award is issued.

Facts of the Case

Prakash Industries Ltd and Bengal Energy Ltd decided to go into arbitration. The reason for opting arbitration is not mentioned. Both the parties completed the arbitration procedure. However, Prakash Industries Ltd did not find the arbitration award to their satisfaction. Hence they filed an appeal under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The reason for the appeal is a request to amend the arbitration petition.

Contentions by the Petitioner 

A senior counsel appearing on their behalf put forth the following arguments. The principle point of argument revolved around one area, which is that the petition did not have reasons amplified. The petitioner submitted that if it is amplified, the outcome ought to change. The learned counsel reasoned the same with several cases. They showed how the Court allowed the amendment of petitions on reasonable grounds. 

Contentions by the Respondent 

In this case, Bengal Energy Ltd is the respondent. The principle point of the argument is explaining the legislative intent of the act. Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is to provide a chance for complete justice. However, letting the petitioners file for an amendment would increase the timeline of litigation. In addition to this, it will drag the case through an unprecedented timeline. In this case, allowing the amendment would defeat the purpose of the act. The counsel supported the argument with several cases.

Interpretation by the Court 

The Court referred to the Code of Civil Procedure. Under Order 6, Rule 17, the amendment of petitions cannot change its nature in any way. Hence, the nature of the case cannot be changed. In addition to this, the Court also considered the Arbitration Act in making its decision. The Act provides for appeal of awards on selected grounds. These grounds include “perversity”, “shocking the conscience of the Court” and “if contrary to public policy”.

The petitioner alleged that the petition did not include the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act. Not including the Sale of Goods Act violates the principles of natural justice. Section 34 of the Arbitration Act allows the appeal in specific cases. Therefore, if there is a lack of proper notice or an unequal opportunity to present the case, then it can be appealed. 

As a result of consideration of sections and case laws, the Court did not allow the amendment to the petition. It relied on the case of Hindustan Construction. Here, the Supreme Court spoke on amendments in the interest of justice. But the Supreme Court did not allow it as it changes the nature of the original case. 

Considering the facts of this case, the nature of the petition would change. Hence, it will also change the nature of the case, which the Court cannot allow.

Conclusion 

The law provides an adequate remedy to cater to situations that cannot be foreseen. Amendment of a petition is definitely for the benefit of the party. No misuse of these benefits should take place even in case of arbitration, as it drags the litigation. Besides, the nature of the case mustn’t change. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -