Shashank Maheshwari

A writ petition was heard by a division bench of the Bombay High Court consisting of Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Milind Jadhav for allowing a pregnancy termination after two weeks under MTP Act, 1971. The plea was rejected by the court. Facts of the Case In this case, a

A division bench of the Bombay High Court consisting of Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Milind Jadhav heard a writ petition dealing with the issue of prohibiting cable operators from airing Republic TV and Republic Bharat. Facts of the Case A communication was issued by the political party Shiv Sena

A division bench of the Nagpur seat of the Bombay High Court consisting of Justice R.K Deshpande and Justice Smt. Pushpa V. Gandediwala took suo moto cognizance of a PIL which was filed to provide adequate medical infrastructural facilities. In this regard, the court gave several directions to the government

Two PILs to regulate the ongoing media trial in light of the death of Sushant Singh Rajput were filed before the Bombay High Court and were heard together by a division bench of Justice A.A. Sayed and Justice Surendra P. Tavde. Facts of the Case A Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

In the case of Ramesh Namdeo Naikwade v. the State of Maharashtra, a division bench of Justice S.S. Shinde and Justice M.S. Karnik of the Bombay High Court held that no basis for conviction is formed on the mere existing suspicion against the accused. Facts of the Case The accused

A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court consisting of Justice Sunil B. Sukhre and Justice Anil S. Kilor gave judgment in the case of Arvind K. Waghmare v. PM Cares Fund and Others on 27th August, 2020, holding that there is no fault in the constitution of the board

A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court consisting of Justice Milind N. Jadhav and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, in the case of Maharashtra Medical Education & Research Centre & other v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., held that the colleges that conducted their entrance exams before the Supreme Court judgment

A Single Bench of Bombay High Court of Justice Smt. Bharati Dangre gave an order in the case of Kapil Wadhwan & Another v. Directorate of Enforcement, in which the court granted bail to the accused. Facts of the Case An ECIR was lodged against Kapil Wadhwan and Dheeraj Wadhwan

A single bench of Bombay High Court’s Justice S.C. Gupte gave an order in the case of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Emami Ltd. Here, the Court granted an interim injunction on Emami from using the trademark ‘Glow and Handsome’. Brief Facts of the Case The present case came before the Court

Justice Milind A. Jadhav, Bombay High Court held that the Commissioner could give orders under the act after hearing the appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Welfare of the Persons with Disabilities established under the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.