Sanjana Santhosh

On 22nd December 2020, a Single Judge Bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr Justice Ashutosh J. Shastri heard the case of Nitin @ Chaddo Amrutbhai v. State of Gujarat via video conferencing. Brief Facts of the Case The petition was filed against the order of detention passed by the Respondent i.e., the detaining

On 23rd December 2020, a Single Judge Bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr Justice A.C. Rao heard the case of Hirabhai Nanabhai Bhoi v. State of Gujarat via video conferencing.  Facts of the Case The Petitioner being a daily wage worker was granted the benefit of Government Resolution on completion of five years

On 24th December 2020, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal heard the case of Mr. Aseem Sawhney v. Mohd. Imran Khan via video conferencing. The appeal was filed by the State against the judgment passed by the learned Principal Sessions

On 22nd December 2020, a Single Judge Bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey heard the case of J&K Tourism Development v. State of Jammu & Kashmir and Others via video conferencing. A writ petition in the nature of Mandamus had been filed by the PETITIONERS on behalf

On 22nd December 2020, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara heard the case of Tarawati v. Union of India & Others via video conferencing. Excerpt The petitioner had filed a writ petition in the nature of Mandamus against the

On 22nd December 2020, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr. S. Muralidhar and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan heard the case of Dwarkadhis Projects Pvt. Ltd v. Punjab National Bank and Anr via video conferencing. The writ petition was filed by the petitioner which is a company incorporated under

Excerpt On 19th December 2020, a Single Judge Bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr Justice Pankaj Bhatia heard the case of Indra Narayan v. State of U.P. and 4 Others via video conferencing. Facts of the Case The Petitioner, in this case, was working as an ad-hoc Collection Peon till the

Excerpt On 21st December 2020, a Single Judge Bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr Justice Lok Pal Singh heard the case of Yukti Constructions Pvt. Ltd v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors via video conferencing. The Petitioner in this case had sought for the following reliefs: Issue a writ, order or

Excerpt On 21st December 2020, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr Justice Rajeev Sahai and Hon’ble Ms Justice Asha Menon heard the case of Sanjeev Dhundia v. Union of India & Ors. via video conferencing. The Petitioner, a Deputy Inspector General (DIG) in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF),

The Rajasthan HC observed that Courts cannot replace the policy decisions made by the State Governments under the powers conferred upon it by the Indian Constitution unless the policy was found to be arbitrary and unreasonable, and therefore allowed for the decision of the government to prevail while determining school fees.