Gujarat High Court Allows Detenue’s Petition, States No Link Is Found Between Offence and Public Order

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

On 22nd December 2020, a Single Judge Bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr Justice Ashutosh J. Shastri heard the case of Nitin @ Chaddo Amrutbhai v. State of Gujarat via video conferencing.

Brief Facts of the Case

The petition was filed against the order of detention passed by the Respondent i.e., the detaining authority in the exercise of powers conferred under section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 by detaining the Petitioner- Detenue as defined under Section 2(c) of the Act.

Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 reads as follows: “Power to make orders detaining certain persons- If having regard to the circumstances prevailing or likely to prevail in any area within the local limits of the jurisdiction of a District Magistrate or a Commissioner of Police, the State Government is satisfied that it is necessary so to do, it may, by order in writing, direct that the District Magistrate or the Commissioner of Police, may also, if satisfied as provided in sub-section (1), exercise the powers conferred by the said sub-section.”

Contentions of the Petitioner

Learned counsel for the Detenue submitted that the Order of detention in the petition deserved to be quashed and set aside on the ground of registration of offences under Sections 324 (Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means), 323 (Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), 294(B) (Obscene acts and songs), 506(2) (Punishment for criminal intimidation), 337 (Causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others), 452 (House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint), 427 (Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees) and 114 (Abettor present when an offence is committed) of the IPC and Section 135 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anit-Social Activities Act, which by itself could not bring the case of the detenue within the purview of the definition under Section 2(c) of the Act.

Further, the Counsel for the Detenue submitted that the commission of illegal activity would not have any nexus with the maintenance of public order, but it could result in the breach of law and order. 

Contentions of the Respondent

The Learned Counsel for the Respondent favoured the detention Order passed by the authority and submitted that adequate evidence was found during the investigation, which was also supplied to the Detenue, indicating that the Detenue had the habit of indulging into the activity as defined under Section 2(c) of the Act and the detaining authority had rightly passed the Order of detention.

Court’s Analysis

The Court opined that the offences alleged did not have any nexus with the public order as required under the Act. Further, until and unless the person posed a threat to the society and disturbed the whole “tempo of society”, it could not be said that the Detenue was a person in the context of Section 2(c) of the Act.

The Court referred to the case of Pushker Mukherjee v. State of West Bengal [AIR 1970 SC 852], which gave a clear distinction between ‘law and order’ and ‘public order’:

“A mere disturbance of law and order leading to disorder is not sufficient for action under the Preventive Detention Act but a disturbance which affects public order is within the scope of the Act.”

The Court also referred to the case of Darpan Kumar Sharma alias Dharban Kumar Sharma v. State of T.N. and others, AIR 2003 SC 971, which held that the disorderly conduct of an individual in public could affect the peace in the locality, however, the same need not necessarily affect the maintenance of public order. 

The Court referred to the case of Arun Ghosh v. State of West Bengal (1970) 1 SCC 98, where it was observed that to determine whether the disturbance amounted to only a breach of law and order, the degree of disturbance and its effect on the community must be measured. 

Court’s Decision 

The Court held that the Detaining Authority had failed to establish that the antisocial activities of the detenue adversely affected the maintenance of public order. Further, there was no link between the offence committed and the passing of the Detention Order. 

The Court also held that mere registration of FIR could not have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order and the authority could not have recourse under the Act. Thus, the petition was allowed by the Court.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -