SanikaSunil

The petition challenged the decision of the IG BSF, Tripura seeking dismissal of service of the petitioner. The petition rejected the prayer for setting aside the sentence of dismissal from service. The division bench comprised of Justice Asha Menon and Justice Rajiv Sahai heard the above matter. Brief Facts of

The three-judge bench of the Supreme Court directs to constitute another bench to decide on the convict’s premature release. It was to decide whether the convict’s premature release was part of the policy of the State Government. Brief Facts of the Case The appellant stands convicted under Section 302 read with

For catering to the issues faced by pregnant women, a person filed a PIL. The petitioner prayed before the Court to direct the respondents to issue guidelines for COVID-19 testing. It laid down issues about priority testing, expeditious proceeding and declaration of results of pregnant women. The single-bench judge comprised

The said petition (Ram Vikas Nigam Ltd. versus Simplex Infrastructures Ltd.) sought termination of the mandate of the Tribunal. It disregarded the ceiling provided in Section IV of the Act while fixing its fee. There was the appointment of a three-member Arbitral Tribunal for adjudicating disputes between the parties. Brief facts

The single-bench judge of Justice V. Kameswar Rao gives a period of 30 days to the owner of Club Factory to file the written statement to the suit. The owner of Club Factory was a party to the defendant. This case comes after the Government of India banned the Club

The appellant impugns the judgment on an order that directs his conviction. The offense was under Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter POCSO). The appellant has to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years along with fine.  Brief facts of the

The petitioner seeks exemption from performing her duties at COVID-19 testing centers as her husband is unwell. Her husband is suffering from Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and also has a child in special care. Moreover, the writ petition was filed without being aware of the fact that exemption can

The writ petition challenged Rule 20(1) of the Coast Guard (General) Rules, 1986 that prescribes retirement age of 57 years. He proposed to amend it to 60 years, thereby releasing all consequential benefits and arrears to the petitioner. Brief Facts of the Case The case in hand is Comdt. S.K.