Delhi High Court Finds No Merit in Dismissing Corruption Charges Against BSF Personnel

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

The petition challenged the decision of the IG BSF, Tripura seeking dismissal of service of the petitioner. The petition rejected the prayer for setting aside the sentence of dismissal from service. The division bench comprised of Justice Asha Menon and Justice Rajiv Sahai heard the above matter.

Brief Facts of the Case

The petitioner, posted as the constable with the Border Security Force (BSF) at the Border Outpost at Guwahati. In 2016, a board of officers conducted a surprise check of the troops of the battalion deployed at this Border Outpost. During the search, the petitioner had cash amounting to Rs. 24,600/- in his possession.

Further, the inquiry revealed that the petitioner had transferred Rs. 1 lakh each to this father and brother. Based on the findings, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under Rule 45 of the BSF Act. The petitioner was charged under four charges but only found guilty for the last three charges and dismissed him from service.

Arguments Before the Court

The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that throughout the trial and review proceedings, their defense had been ignored. They submitted that after rendering ten years of service, the transfer of Rs. 2 lakhs is not disproportionate to his known sources of income. No inference justifies that the petitioner had indulged in corrupt practices. Also, they contended that the punishment of dismissal from service was disproportionate to the accusation as no criminal proceedings had been initiated against the petitioner for alleged involvement in smuggling.

The opposite counsel contends that the petitioner indulged in corrupt practices. Thus, ignoring the mandate of border duties and being a threat to the nation’s security.

Court’s Ruling

The Delhi High Court found no merit in the submissions made by the petitioner. The entire defense set up by the petitioner about the amount transferred and sources of income are far from convincing and rightly rejected at all stages.

It is relevant to say that the petitioner while deployed at Border Out Post in a highly smuggling prone area was found in possession of the pecuniary resources disproportionate to his known source of income, for which, he has been tried by a competent court within the ambit of BSF Act & Rules after following prescribed procedures and after having been found guilty, awarded the sentence.

The defense proved the corruption charges instituted against the petitioner beyond all reasonable doubt. In view of the above reasoning, no merit is found in the petition, and it stands dismissed.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -