Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal For Quashing The Conviction Of The Appellant In Child Sexual Assault Case

Must Read

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions,...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by...

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Follow us

The appellant impugns the judgment on an order that directs his conviction. The offense was under Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter POCSO). The appellant has to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years along with fine. 

Brief facts of the case

The victim is a 9-year-old who was present in the house with her brother. The appellant came and enquired about the presence of the mother. When he got to know that the mother was away, he walked into the house and started touching and rubbing the thighs of the child victim. The victim got frightened, and tried to run from the house and went to the neighborhood house.

When she found out that no one was home, she returned to her house. After an hour, the appellant came into the house again, but the victim asked the appellant to leave and he left. Half an hour later, when the victim was going to her tuition class, the appellant once again met her and asked her at what time she would return. She did not respond and proceeded to her tuition. In the night, she came home and informed her mother, and thereafter they called the police. 

Arguments before the court

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the testimonies of the child victim, her mother and brother remain consistent before the court. They submit that there are no discrepancies in the statement of the witnesses. Also,  no material is present to show a loan transaction between the parties. They submit that the appellant, a mere worker could not extend any loan of any form. The learned counsel for the appellant contends that there was a discrepancy in the statement of the victim. They further contend that the entire complaint seems to be an outcome of a loan transaction between the appellant and the mother of the victim. 

Court’s ruling

The Delhi High Court is of the view that based on the testimony of the child victim and her family, there is no reason to disbelieve it. The testimony was also of sterling quality and there was no point of any discrepancy. The appellant did not show any reason to prove the testimony as unreliable too. Pulling down the leggings and touching the thighs is evident of sexual intent. It constitutes an offence of sexual assault under the POCSO Act. Since the sexual assault was committed on a child below 12 years, it amounts to aggravated sexual assault. It is punishable under Section 10 of the POCSO Act. The appeal is thus dismissed and the conviction is upheld. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -