Justice Jyoti Singh delivered the judgment in the case of Prabhat Ranjan Deo v. Union Public Service Commission. It relied on an authoritative decision of the Supreme Court. It states that one can approach the High Courts when there is a challenge to the parent statute of any Tribunal. Brief
A Division Bench consisting of Justice Subramonium Prasad and Justice Hima Kohli heard the case of Prasar Bharati v. M/S Stracon India Limited & Anr. The Court held that an appeal against an arbitral award is not maintainable if it does not fall under the restrictions of Section 37 of
A Division Bench comprising of Justice Indu Malhotra and Justice L.Nageswara Rao heard the case of Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali. The Apex Court remarked that it is a classic case, where the plaintiffs drafted the plaint. It is an attempt to make an illusory cause of action, and bring
A division bench comprised of Justice Arun Mishra and Justice S. Abdul Nazeer heard the case of Reepak Kansal v. The Secretary, Supreme Court of India. The Court stated that the Court staff are working despite the dangers posed by the pandemic. There should be no unnecessary aspersions upon the
Justice Mukta Gupta heard the cases of Sanjay Kumar Valmiki v State and Chandra Kant Jha v. State of NCT of Delhi. There was a relation between both cases. This is because they were talking about the same question of law relating to the grant of furlough. The court held that upon
In an administrative order dated 26.06.2020, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has adjourned the hearing of all cases till the 4th of August 2020. Present Order This order is to ensure the safety of judges, advocates and other staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. All cases listed from 29th June till 31st
On 28.08.2020, an urgent hearing of Maghi Devi v. Union of India and Ors was held. The bench consisted of Justice A.M Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. It was to decide on a plea filed by a parent against Rajasthan High Court’s decision to conduct exams on 29th and 30th
A Single Bench of Justice Aniruddha Bose presided to decide the case of Shamita Singha and Anr. v. Rashmi Ahluwalia and Anr. The Court ruled that to meet the ends of justice, we should not give priority to first filed suit before the suit filed later. The degree of relation between the
On 18.06.2020, a Full Bench comprising of Justice Arun Mishra, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Justice M.R Shah presided for hearing the litigation of the AGR case. A batch of seven connected petitions were filed, collectively referred as In Re Mandar Deshpande. Background The Court on 11.06.2020 gave an order
Telecom Service Providers (TSPs) are required to pay a license fee to DoT. This is in consideration of license granted by DoT on behalf of the Central Government. At first, DoT proposed a fixed license fee regime. This fixed regime predefined a lump sum to be paid by TSPs. Then,
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
