Supreme Court: Rajasthan Board Exams To Continue As Decided, Plea Dismissed In An Urgent Hearing

Must Read

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on...

Follow us

On 28.08.2020, an urgent hearing of Maghi Devi v. Union of India and Ors was held. The bench consisted of Justice A.M Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. It was to decide on a plea filed by a parent against Rajasthan High Court’s decision to conduct exams on 29th and 30th of June. This was ahead of CBSE deciding to cancel exams of Class 10 and 12 students.

Brief Facts of the Case

On May 29, the Rajasthan High Court had allowed the Rajasthan Board State Examination to conduct the exams. This order was challenged in the Supreme Court.

One paper of each class was remaining and scheduled to be held on June 29th (Class 10, Social Science) and 30th (Class 12, Maths). The petitioner, a parent stated that the decision of the state board to conduct the two papers was ‘erroneous’. Thus, it deserves to be ‘set aside’ owing to the COVID- 19 situation in the state.

She stated that 12 lakh students, who appear for the exams will get exposed to Coronavirus. Also, 120 schools which were examination centres are now used to quarantine people. Adding further, “conducting of examinations is wrong illegal and discriminatory. This is because it jeopardises the health of the students undertaking the exams. Thus, amounting to a violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution.”

Actions taken by the Court

A special hearing took place today at 6:30 pm. The Bench refused to interfere with Rajasthan High Court’s decision to conduct the two-state board exams for Classes 10 and 12.

The Apex Court observed that the petitioners approached the court at the last moment. The fact remains that the Rajasthan State Government has taken all necessary measures about COVID-19 norms. It stated that the High Court had passed the order to hold exams a month back.

Court’s Order

Observing that people have filed such pleas earlier too, it stated that- “Exams are set to start from tomorrow, and petitioners have not pointed out any major inconvenience”. The Supreme Court had cancelled the remaining Board exams for both CBSE and ICSE students because of the COVID-19 crisis. The declaration of results will be on 15 July based on a special marking system. But, Class XII students, who are not satisfied with their results, may appear for their remaining exams. For Class X, no further examination will be conducted and the results based on the special assessment scheme will be treated as final.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish Bisht & Anr. v. State...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -