Khushi Chopra

The Court directed that in light of the submissions made by the writ applicant and respondent authorities that the Input Tax Credit be transferred to the existing GSTIN number at the earliest request by the provisions contained in Section 18 of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Background

The Court directed that because no illegality was committed by the respondent authority in canceling the license of the petitioner of fair price shop, the present petition of renewing that license was accordingly dismissed. Background The present petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

Both the petitions arose from the award passed by Labour Court, Ahmedabad dated 28.5.2007, whereby the Labour Court had directed the employer-petitioner to reinstate the workman in service with 25% back wages and as both the petitions had arisen out of the same award, both were disposed of by this

Excerpt A single-judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honorable Justice Bhargav D. Karia had been hearing submissions of the applicant to exercise writ jurisdiction. The Bench perused the record of the case and dismissed the petitions as those were devoid of any merit in the case of Modi

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from Family Court at Surat to Family Court at Bhavnagar would succeed and was allowed accordingly in the case of Riddhi Mihir Jariwala vs Mihir Hariharbhai Jariwala.

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956 before this Hon’ble Court and to direct the Voluntary liquidator of the company to preserve its Books of accounts. The Court allowed

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to get their names registered in the society’s records as far as the bungalow was concerned with the will, had allowed the petition in the case of

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956 before this Hon’ble Court and to direct the Voluntary liquidator of the company to preserve its Books of accounts. The Court allowed

Excerpt: By the present application, the Applicant had prayed to condone the delay in filing the Tax Appeal, which questioned the legality and validity of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot, dated 02.08.2018. Background: Various averments were made by the Applicant in the application seeking condonation

Excerpt In the present case, two petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed where the orders under challenge, dated 22.12.2020 were such by which, the nominations for the delegate of petitioners’ society to contest elections were rejected. Background As far as the first application was concerned, there