Ayush Menon

Introduction: It would not be wrong to give a metaphorical representation to the previous ‘laws’ regulating companies as water and the ‘concept’ of human rights as oil since it was difficult to find the correlation between two of them. Back then, the only objective of the companies, businesses and organisations

Introduction:- India is a country that has incorporated the characteristics of both, a unitary form of governance and federal form of governance. Its unitary feature includes parliamentary supremacy whereas its federal feature comprises a single unified judicial system with a three-tier structure, i.e., The Supreme Court, High Courts and other

Introduction Sedition in India is a disputed topic. Since its insertion under section 124A of Indian Penal Code, it has been used as an instrument by the government in power to limit criticism & disagreement or dissent. It is a type of law that a government in power always favours

Introduction ‘Celebratory firing’ means firing of shots into the air on occasion of any celebration. The practice is prevalent in some countries but this document specifically focuses on the celebratory firing in India. If we closely look at the scenario in India so mostly celebratory firing is being done in

  Introduction  This maxim means “hear the other side” or no man should be unheard, both the parties have an opportunity of being heard. Justice will be given to both parties. Audi Alteram Partem is a Latin phrase “audiatur et altera pars”. This is a very strong rule which means

INTRODUCTION Ever since the Supreme Court declared the practice of triple talaq as unconstitutional in the case of Shayara Bano, another demand raised by the women’s rights activists was to ban the practice of polygamy or the practice of keeping multiple wives at the same time which is allowed in

Citation: 119 (2005) Dlt 1 FACTS OF THE CASE The petitioner and the complainant married in 2012 and gave birth to girl in 2013. Two months after her birth, they had a quarrel in which the complainant sought a share of the petitioner’s family’s property. They started living separately and

Citation: AIR 2012 Mad 62 A father approached the Madras High Court to order the Inspector of Police (the first respondent) to ensure his daughter’s release from the custody of a father and his son (second and third respondents). The petitioner contended that the respondents had kidnapped her and documented