Why ‘We’ are hypocrite about technology?

Must Read

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Follow us

We often see people blaming that watching television is the reason behind the poor performance of their children in exams. People are generally critical of ‘Technology’ for their own faults, particularly, the social media, Smartphone, etc. Parents who are restricting their kids to be on ‘facebook’ are ironically found on ‘facebook’ themselves. People who are criticizing drones for being intrusive are sharing every bit of their information on social networking sites. Then, what is this hypocrisy about? Is it just that we became habitual of criticizing technology all the time for own faults based on our own fallacies?

In a democracy, the ideas between the individuals must be promoted. In the last ten years or so, we have seen a tremendous change in the way people communicate in India, it became fast due to the advancement in information and communication technology (ICT). We are becoming more sophisticated users of technology day by day. ICT is undoubtedly providing one such platform for individuals to express themselves. One cannot doubt that technology is making us independent, connecting us, transforming us, and changing our perception to look out the world in a new way altogether. But, why do we still criticise it? Be it the Smartphone or the Internet or the Robotics, they have just become a part of our society. Even the practice of religion is largely dependent on technology nowadays. Be it the ‘traditional’ loudspeakers or the sound system in any religious establishment, or the ‘modern’ digital call of prayers at a scheduled time in your Smartphone, or reading of holy text in ‘kindle’, these are all technological innovations and just making the practice of a religion convenient.

Hence, the pertinent question here is it justifiable to criticize the technology for not bringing the solution with it?  Like, if a social networking platform is being used for fanning rumours & hatred as it did in ‘Muzzaffarnagar riots’,  was it the fault  of the users or the technology? Who should be criticised for it? I’m sure the users must hold liability for it; technology should not be condemned for it. Here what is necessary to be looked into that why the technology has been invented, implemented, who are the people using it and where it is being used? The paradox and the circumstances, be it social, economic or political must be looked into before being decisive upon a ‘technology’.  The social system in which it ‘exists’ must be considered, for instance, people who are using technology related devices like Smartphone in metros like Delhi would certainly use it differently compared to who are using it in a small town.  Similarly, a computer student can use a laptop in so many different ways than a philosophy student. So, what matters in the case of technology is not the ‘technology’ itself rather the factors or circumstances in which it exists.

I do not find myself in agreement with those who say that usage of technology like Smartphone is leading to ‘social isolation’.  Further, that it is distancing us from our near & dear ones. I think it’s not. It’s rather empowering us and considered as a communication technology. And in a democracy any medium which promotes the communication of ideas amongst the individuals must be encouraged. Talking to somebody who is physically near to you doesn’t mean he/ she is endearing to you. If a person wants to talk to someone who is far away from him /her and any medium which is helping to do so must be appreciated.  And obviously, in a free society none can be compelled to talk to somebody. Hence, technology must not be blamed in any case for creating for not talking to people who are placed near to you as it is a conscious choice.

People like to ‘criticise’ and never stop complaining about the existing things. They are habitual of praising the past or perhaps, ‘Manto’ was right in his own way in labelling the society being ‘hypocrite’ but technology should not suffer due to this very human nature. Hence, it is our duty as a responsible citizen to make the best use of technology and should not blame for not bringing the solution with it. Policies must be formulated to regulate any technology by considering the socio-economic factors that have influenced its very creation. As Sustainable development goals mention ‘infrastructure’ expressly and sustainable technology has a pivotal role to play in its development.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -