Why ‘We’ are hypocrite about technology?

Must Read

Explained: The Scope of Article 21 During the Era of COVID-19

“One’s right to self, their body, their health, and their livelihoods is inherent to living a meaningful human life, Human...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Solving Healthcare Issues Using Blockchain Technology

In troubled times that follow a pandemic, almost all nations are forced to take stock of the gaps present...

Follow us

We often see people blaming that watching television is the reason behind the poor performance of their children in exams. People are generally critical of ‘Technology’ for their own faults, particularly, the social media, Smartphone, etc. Parents who are restricting their kids to be on ‘facebook’ are ironically found on ‘facebook’ themselves. People who are criticizing drones for being intrusive are sharing every bit of their information on social networking sites. Then, what is this hypocrisy about? Is it just that we became habitual of criticizing technology all the time for own faults based on our own fallacies?

In a democracy, the ideas between the individuals must be promoted. In the last ten years or so, we have seen a tremendous change in the way people communicate in India, it became fast due to the advancement in information and communication technology (ICT). We are becoming more sophisticated users of technology day by day. ICT is undoubtedly providing one such platform for individuals to express themselves. One cannot doubt that technology is making us independent, connecting us, transforming us, and changing our perception to look out the world in a new way altogether. But, why do we still criticise it? Be it the Smartphone or the Internet or the Robotics, they have just become a part of our society. Even the practice of religion is largely dependent on technology nowadays. Be it the ‘traditional’ loudspeakers or the sound system in any religious establishment, or the ‘modern’ digital call of prayers at a scheduled time in your Smartphone, or reading of holy text in ‘kindle’, these are all technological innovations and just making the practice of a religion convenient.

Hence, the pertinent question here is it justifiable to criticize the technology for not bringing the solution with it?  Like, if a social networking platform is being used for fanning rumours & hatred as it did in ‘Muzzaffarnagar riots’,  was it the fault  of the users or the technology? Who should be criticised for it? I’m sure the users must hold liability for it; technology should not be condemned for it. Here what is necessary to be looked into that why the technology has been invented, implemented, who are the people using it and where it is being used? The paradox and the circumstances, be it social, economic or political must be looked into before being decisive upon a ‘technology’.  The social system in which it ‘exists’ must be considered, for instance, people who are using technology related devices like Smartphone in metros like Delhi would certainly use it differently compared to who are using it in a small town.  Similarly, a computer student can use a laptop in so many different ways than a philosophy student. So, what matters in the case of technology is not the ‘technology’ itself rather the factors or circumstances in which it exists.

I do not find myself in agreement with those who say that usage of technology like Smartphone is leading to ‘social isolation’.  Further, that it is distancing us from our near & dear ones. I think it’s not. It’s rather empowering us and considered as a communication technology. And in a democracy any medium which promotes the communication of ideas amongst the individuals must be encouraged. Talking to somebody who is physically near to you doesn’t mean he/ she is endearing to you. If a person wants to talk to someone who is far away from him /her and any medium which is helping to do so must be appreciated.  And obviously, in a free society none can be compelled to talk to somebody. Hence, technology must not be blamed in any case for creating for not talking to people who are placed near to you as it is a conscious choice.

People like to ‘criticise’ and never stop complaining about the existing things. They are habitual of praising the past or perhaps, ‘Manto’ was right in his own way in labelling the society being ‘hypocrite’ but technology should not suffer due to this very human nature. Hence, it is our duty as a responsible citizen to make the best use of technology and should not blame for not bringing the solution with it. Policies must be formulated to regulate any technology by considering the socio-economic factors that have influenced its very creation. As Sustainable development goals mention ‘infrastructure’ expressly and sustainable technology has a pivotal role to play in its development.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -