Vizag Gas Leak: Its Impact, Legal Issues, Relief And Remedial Measures

Must Read

Explained: The Right to be Forgotten in India

Right to Privacy is an essential fundamental right which has been enshrined in the Indian Constitution under Article 21...

How will the New WhatsApp Privacy Policy Affect Us?

On January 4, 2020, the California based tech giant WhatsApp announced its new privacy law. It allows data integration...

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

Follow us

The Vizag Gas Leak happened on May 7, 2020. It happened in LG Polymers chemical plant near Gokalapatnam, Vishakhapatnam in Andhra Pradesh. This incident resulted in the death of 13 people and sickness from gas exposure of 1,000 people. 

Background: Why it happened?

The plant was first established as Hindustan Polymers in 1961. Later it went on to merge with McDowell and Co. in 1978. In 1997, South Korea-based LG Chem acquired it and changed its name to LG Polymers India.

In May 2019, it came to light that LG Chem lacked official environmental clearance. Environmental clearance from the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEFCC). The first time the company applied for environmental clearance from Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board for expansion was also in May 2019.  

The plant reopened on May 7 after the lockdown imposed in India due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 2,000 tons worth of styrene stored in the plant was left unattended. Styrene is an element used in manufacturing polystyrene. Storage of styrene should be between 20-22 oC, above which temperature it vaporizes. Now, there was a cooling system in place for the maintenance of the same. There are suspicions that this system had a computer glitch.

What exactly happened?

The styrene vaporized and leaked out, spreading to the nearby villages over a radius of 3 km. This was due to the computer glitch in the cooling system which was not attended. The villages of R. R. Venkatapuram, Padmapuram, BC Colony, Gopalapatnam, and Kamparapalem were most affected. People were rushed to hospitals. It was reported that they had difficulties in breathing and their eyes burned. There were 13 reported deaths by May 8. Over 1000 people suffered from gas exposure. The police ordered a precautionary evacuation on May 7 late at night in a 2 km radius.

Impact, relief and remedial measures

There were 13 reported deaths and over 1000 people suffering from gas-exposure sickness. After an inspection following up the leak, two experts appointed by the National Disaster Management Authority said that there was a risk of a leak of a much larger scale if the violated safety rules were ignored for long. The Andhra Pradesh government made the company move 13,000 metric tonnes of material out of India.

Andhra Pradesh CM Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy revealed ex-gratia payments of 1 crore to families of the dead. Also, there would be distribution of sums of 25,000 rupees to those who underwent primary treatment. Moreover, it was said that 1 lakh rupees were distributed to those who got longer treatment, and 10 lakh rupees to be provided to those who had to be put on ventilator support was also announced.

The Andhra Pradesh government also airlifted 500 kg of PTBC. This was to neutralize the effects of gas leak from Vapi, Daman. To ensure precautions, LG Polymers bought a device called a styrene inhibitor to reduce gas leak risks in the future. It also dispatched an eight-member technical team to investigate and rehabilitation. They came from Seoul, South Korea.

Legal action, NGT decision and SC’s intervention

Legal Action 

The local police filed an FIR against LG Polymers under sections 278 (making atmosphere noxious to health), 284 (negligent conduct with respect to poisonous substance), 285 (negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible substance), 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 337 (causing hurt by endangering human life or personal safety of others due to rash or negligent act), and 338 (causing grievous hurt by endangering human life or personal safety of others due to rash or negligent act) of the Indian Penal Code.

NGT’s Decision 

A petition filed in the National Green Tribunal (NGT) led to a hearing of the case on May 8, 2020. The bench ordered LG Polymers to deposit 50 crore rupees initially. This was to be given to Vishakapatnam for mitigation of damages. Notices were issued to the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB), the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), seeking responses from the individual boards and the ministry. It also formed a five-member high-level committee. This was to probe into the matter. Supervision was by the former Andhra Pradesh judge, B. Seshasayana Reddy.

The National Human Rights Commission of India sent notices to the Government of India and Andhra Pradesh. It classified the incident as a gross violation of the right to life. It sought a detailed report from the government of Andhra Pradesh. Moreover, it asked about rescue, medical treatment, and rehabilitation. They further asked to cover the Union Ministry of Corporate Affairs’ investigation. The investigation was about the breach in workplace health and safety law.

The NGT ordered the framing of a restoration plan. They tried to finally quantify the damages to be paid to victims. Also, they decided to take action against officials responsible on June 1. It stated that the company has absolute liability.

The advocate for LG Polymers contended that the company could not mount a defense. This was due to sealing its records. The NGT inquiry report was published only 3 days before giving it inadequate time to respond. This led to the Supreme Court staying the order of the National Green Tribunal for 10 days on 15 June 2020.

What it means for India?

India has had a short journey with environmental law. We are still figuring out how to progress in the technological and industrial fields. The Bhopal Gas Tragedy and MC Mehta vs Union of India led to some innovation in the field. But, India has yet to go a long way. Environmental awareness is important, and accountability in cases like these is important. Multi-national companies who ignore safety procedures and regulations need to be held accountable. The path to progress cannot be without safety and care.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

Delhi High Court Restrains Publication of Book on “the Ryan School Murder”

The Order had come in an injunction application filed by the St. Xavier's Education Trust in Delhi. The Plaintiff sought ad-interim restraining order on...

Supreme Court Closed Proceeding in Case of “in Re: Advocate on Record Includes a Proprietary Firm Etc.”

Brief facts of the case Emails from the Petitioner resulted in an administrative decision. An Order of the Supreme Court has drawn up the issue...

Supreme Court To Hear Female Army Officers Plea on Non-Implementation of the Permanent Commission

Claiming that its order granting Permanent Commission to women in the army’s non-combat support units on par with the male counterparts was not implemented well, many Women Army officers have approached the Supreme Court.

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -